thelyingchannel: Open Discussion

About Us...

Exposing the lies and seeking truth doesn't = Hate. This is not a Kate Hate Site. A 'Kate Hate Site" wouldn't have "Shame on Kate AND Shame on Jon" in the reaction box.

Just a place where bloggers and commenters can share an open discussion on all things related to the Gosselins.

This blog was created to expose the spins and lies shared by the media and by several individuals who continue to spread filth and garbage for their own self-interests.

This blog will expose those who continue to spread lies as "truth" and those who base their beliefs and support for one individual based on those lies.

Pursuing Truth, Exposing Lies and Informing the Sheeple

February 1, 2010

Open Discussion - February

Kids are cold, but at least Kate has a little coat on.

Source
The sheeple just being "jibberjabbers"? Some troll on USmagazine is using my alias to post comments.

Click to see larger image.

I'm guessing the same troll wrote this one.

Click to see larger image.

Notice the evil look on Kate's pigly face.

Kate is "pressuring Jon to reconsider his objections of the filming of their children". Kate says she is willing to work with TLC to drop their charges against him if Jon is willing to sell out their kids. This proves Kate does have a say in what TLC does wth Jon and that she wants TLC to sue Jon to put the "pressure" on him, so that he would consider giving up the kids for filming.

Kate the UNFIT mother is using her kids as BARGAINING CHIPS! What a FN loser Kate is. Is it all about the kids? Or is it all about HER SHOW?

Very nice Katie. Let the world know how much you care about your kids.

---------
Source:
“Jon does not have money for the intense lawyer fees and ensuing battle with the media giant and Kate has asked him to reconsider his decision for the family,” the source said. “She is willing to negotiate with him and TLC so that everyone gets what they want.”

But while the former couple is working toward a professional relationship, don’t expect them to become the best of friends any time soon.
---------
Here's a thought Kate...

Instead of dragging the kids into this, why not just lower the child support payments? Instead of 10k+ a month, why not lower it to something more reasonable? Give Jon something he can actually handle UNTIL he finds a job or is able to work in media when TLC removes the restrictions.

Why not request TLC to DROP their charges against Jon? Why wait until Jon releases the kids for filming before you talk with TLC? Maybe if TLC drops their charges, Jon could get a job in the media like you and the kids wouldn't have to be dragged back into the world of TLC.

That right Kate, it's not about the kids or the family is it Kate? We can see right thru you. If it's all about the family, why are you allowing TLC to ruin the single father of 8?
------

Sheeple Vol. 3 is out!

Why Kate should never wear a mini skirt out in pubic ever again.

And CLOSE your mouth when you chew.
-----------

Source:
1) Kate drew up a secret contract that allows Jon to have girlfriends on the side — as long as he stays on the show.

2) She has cut off her entire family -- even her parents -- and spends less and less time with her eight children while she promotes her career.

3) Her explosive temper and controlling ways have led to bitter battles between the TV couple.

Could #1 be the reason why Jon's apartment was ransacked? Did Kate offer Hailey some $$$ to look for said contract? Is that where the "Missing" 55k went? Is that why she had to go to Kinkos to make copies of her expenses? LOL Hand written expenses to "cover" her tracks. I can't believe the court actually used that with no receipts to back it up. A forensic accountant would put Kate in deep doo doo. To bad Mark Heller isn't bright enough to request one.

346 comments:

«Oldest ‹Older 1 – 200 of 346 Newer› Newest»

Anonymous said... [Reply]: Blab,blab,blab..I know kate got her ways& Jon got his ways.There divorces everyday..Jon a saint against JOHN EDWARDS,I HATE JOHN b/c he wanted to kill a baby,plus treating his wife like he did,plus bringing the whore to sleep in the same bed his wife slept in..Jon/Kate just a minor situation compared to this dirty filthy pig John Edwards..I will have to give JON some credit.1= he didn't want to abort a child..2= he didn't sleep with another woman in Kate bed why they were married.. I will give Kate credit as well..1= she doing the best she can taking care of the children & working somebody got too.So,farewell to Jon/Kate I have moved on..JJ I hope u can move on & let Jon/Kate live their life..I'm going to rag on about the SOB John Edwards & pray to GOD I never see that SOB...... GOOD BYE..; February 1, 2010 at 5:31 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: I can totally agree with you on that one anon. The John Edwards et al story is sad and sickening beyond belief. You might want to try Z's blog at the Baltimore Sun. There's some interesting conversations going on there.

weblogs.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/zontv; February 1, 2010 at 8:33 AM
Lauren said... [Reply]: New pictures of Kate and her weave out shopping with the boys.

Ted Gibson should be proud.

http://www.infdaily.com/2010/02/kate-gosselin-takes-the-kids-and-her-hair-extensions-grocery-shopping.html; February 1, 2010 at 10:44 AM
SG said... [Reply]: Once again the children are not dressed appropriately for the weather. It is FREEZING up here and they are just wearing vests. Poor Collin looks frozen. Who dresses these kids for outdoors?!?!?!?; February 1, 2010 at 11:48 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Thanks for the link Lauren..

So the 3-4 days Kate was missing from the limelight, she and the kids were taking acting lessons.

Nice to see the kids are told to look at the camera and smile.

And she's "holding" the boys hands now. Usually she's on her cell phone and about 10 steps ahead of the kids, rushing to her SUV.

Now it's smile for the paps.

Kate still looks like an evil bltch in all those pics.; February 1, 2010 at 12:28 PM
Paula Caldarella said... [Reply]: It's Monday. Aren't the tups supposed to bein school? Oh, yeah, that's right, the boys were needed for a photo op.; February 1, 2010 at 1:18 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: ^ Good point. Are they still attending 3 day classes?; February 1, 2010 at 1:23 PM
Sage said... [Reply]: sage said...
I don't have just have "Kaydar". I also have my ouji board. LOL

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
JJ, Did you feel your hair get ruffled on the top of your head when this flew over?
I was being FLIPPANT. LOL; February 1, 2010 at 4:13 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Exactly, we should never take anything the sheeple say as "serious". It's pretty much out there.

I mean, go take a look at kaydar online right now and read the comments.; February 1, 2010 at 4:16 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: I believe the "bad" hair is done on purpose. To "pull" the attention away from her bad parenting skills and to get people to "talk" about her hair instead of whats important.

- Her horrible parenting skills.
- Why the kids aren't in school.
- Is she seeking therapy or any type of help for her personality disorder?
- Are the kids getting therapy or counseling.
- etc etc.; February 1, 2010 at 7:40 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Skanktoro claims the kids misses the cameras and the TLC crew members. How the hell does she know?

Is she still on contact with the kids? If she cared so much for the kids, why the hell did she make up the story that she slept with Jon?

Doesn't she know the damage she caused by her lies?

She is just repeating what Kate or TLC wants her to say.

"The kids misses the TLC crew and Camera". Sounds like something Kate would say.

Connect the dots.; February 1, 2010 at 8:14 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Kate isn't Organic after all. No show, no Organic?

---
http://preesi.lefora.com/2010/02/01/why-no-organic-kate/#post9; February 1, 2010 at 9:00 PM
Lauren said... [Reply]: Jibber Jabbers - Could you change the hair on the second "J" in your blog header so that it looks like the mop on Kate's head?

If not, no problem. Just thought it would be a nice touch.; February 1, 2010 at 9:30 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: I can't do it. That hair is way to messy for me to cut and paste. LOL

----------

And goodbye anonymous at 5:31.; February 1, 2010 at 11:16 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: SchmeckyGirl said...

Once again the children are not dressed appropriately for the weather. It is FREEZING up here and they are just wearing vests. Poor Collin looks frozen. Who dresses these kids for outdoors?!?!?!?

------------

Well, at least the person that matters the most is nice and warm. It's 'her' life. They're just in it.; February 1, 2010 at 11:18 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: In the "I'm the King of the World" video (posted January 20), Jon recapped how much fun he and the kids had had playing hide-n-seek and how he wished they could do it, "in a bigger house or a garden -- outside would be great!"

At a considerably later point in time, after J&K separated, Kate gave an interview in which she said that anyone who wants to step into her world had better be brave.

I don't think Kate's going to find anyone braver than Jon. He was so happy in that "King of the World" video -- like he didn't have a care -- even though he was leaving himself vulnerable to a suspicious, jealous, exploitative demon.; February 2, 2010 at 3:34 AM
SunnyDays said... [Reply]: Those extensions will be gone soon enough. I can't believe some people are still making excuses for this woman. She did a whole spread in People to announce her new extensions to the world. What did she think people were going to say when she left her house looking like she had a hay stack shoved under a hat on top of her head? Once again, Kate is a phony with no conviction for her actions. Does she ever follow through with anything she starts?

Also, what the heck?? No matchy, matchy outfits on the boys?? She's really slipping! ;); February 2, 2010 at 4:16 AM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: Just watched "shopping for 10" yesterday. Kate was so proud of herself that she got "two carts full" or groceries for $150.00. First of all neither of those carts were near full. If you know how to pack a cart you can get $300 to $400 dollars in it. I know i have done it. All of those bags could have went in one cart and she could have taken them to the car all by herself. plus if that is all that she feeds 10 people for a week then it is no wonder that when the tups got their preschool dr.'s checkup they weighed what my 2 1/2 year old weighed at the time.; February 2, 2010 at 6:31 AM
SunnyDays said... [Reply]: Anonymous said...
Just watched "shopping for 10" yesterday...
-----------------------------------

What is "shopping for 10"?; February 2, 2010 at 6:51 AM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: shopping for 10 is an episode of jon and kate plus8; February 2, 2010 at 11:54 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: I go shopping for 2 and my cart is always full. Not sure who Kate was shopping for on a school day. Look at her cart, shopping for 1?

Seems like another failed Photo-op.; February 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: Lauren said...
"New pictures of Kate and her weave out shopping with the boys."

------------
She's still wearing hooker heels, but gone are the boys' bulky jackets that sometimes get dragged on the ground. Where are that woman's priorities.; February 2, 2010 at 5:26 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: kaydar has a few new pics up of Kate hitting up the "spas" after a hard day of work. (sitting on her ass). While the nannies and personal chefs do the rest.; February 2, 2010 at 5:34 PM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: Kate's days as a "celebutant" may be headed for an end. Z on TV said it appears any future "Kate Series" maybe dead in the water possibly due to focus groups being unimpressed with TLC's latest hair brained idea.

If only that would be true. It's time for Celbri-Kate to finally go away. I can only hope. It would be good to see such an ungrateful woman taken down a few pegs.; February 2, 2010 at 9:01 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Like everyone stated, TLC is only holding onto Kate until the lawsuit with Jon is over and done it.

Kate is an idiot and should have jump ship with Jon and his lawsuit against TLC. Kate again is a moron.

She really think she's a "star" or a "celebrity". She's about to get a huge wake up call come spring.; February 2, 2010 at 9:12 PM
SunnyDays said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...
Like everyone stated, TLC is only holding onto Kate until the lawsuit with Jon is over and done it.

-----------------------------------

I agree that those who follow the saga of J&K+8 realized some time ago the possibility that TLC was just stringing Kate along until the lawsuit with Jon was settled. Does anyone think Kate is starting to wake-up to this possibility yet?

I would describe Kate as manipulative, greedy, insincere, etc. but not stupid. Normally, people who would not think twice about stabbing someone else in the back for their own gain (Kate) are overly suspicious of others doing the same to them, so I can’t believe that the thought that TLC is using her hasn’t crossed her mind. I am wondering if she will eventually jump the TLC ship and join forces with Jon. That’s the route she should have taken in the beginning since IMO, TLC played a HUGE role in the demise of their family.

I’m not sure how I would feel about her if she did join in with the lawsuit. At this point, it is almost impossible to have any respect for the women but at least she would be holding TLC responsible for their part in hurting her family. One of the things that I always thought was incredibly crappy about Kate as a mother was that she chose to ignore the emotional harm TLC was causing her kids for the almighty buck. What kind of mother could do that? As a mom, if my kids are hurting, I am there fierce as hell trying to protect them.

Does anyone else think she could do an about face so late in the game or do you think she painted herself in a corner and has to deal with TLC until they decide they are done with her?; February 3, 2010 at 6:35 AM
SG said... [Reply]: I personally think Kate really wants a show so she is going to stick with TLC. I think that only after TLC drops her will she consider a lawsuit. I also think her true reason will be to screw them for screwing her. I don't think her lawsuit will really be based on what it did to her family. I'm not sure Kate believes TLC had anything to do with it. I think she blames Jon not TLC.; February 3, 2010 at 9:52 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: SchumeckyGirl, I totally agree with you. I sometimes wonder if TLC is somewhat afraid of what Kate can or will do unless they give her what she wants. I know they're a big corporation, but they also know Kate probably better than Jon does. They made her.; February 3, 2010 at 10:22 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: LOL! I didn't mean to call you SchumeckyGirl. Honest! I just can't type. Sorry. I love and very much agree with your posts here, there and everywhere. :); February 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: What exactly is Jon's countersuit about? If I remember right he's asking for 5 mil. but I've kind of lost track. And is it an arbitrator that's going settle it rather than a judge? In April? I guess I'm lost on this.; February 3, 2010 at 10:32 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Everyone at Kaydar is now "celebrating" about the DA questioning Jon over the break-in.

They are just "questioning" him. It doesn't mean he's guilty. What they should have done was question him in the very beginning.

He was in PA with the kids over the holidays. Only Hailey had access to the apartment and knew which room Jon stayed in.; February 3, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: So this blog is the "the other side of the story?" What story? The one you make up in your head? What facts have you? Is it all speculation or does anyone have anything solid to contribute?; February 3, 2010 at 10:55 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: JibberJabbers, I read the Jon/DA story. So, right or wrong, it will be the usual negative spin on Jon. I'm just trying to think of what his motive might be? Jon might be a lot of things but I don't think he's malicious. If he was going to blow up and frame someone I would have thought his ex-wife was a more logical target. As always, we shall soon see. TLC gets to squeeze out an extra minute for Kate. Maybe even two.; February 3, 2010 at 11:11 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: The evidences are out there if you look hard enough. Don't look in the "Open discussion" to get the other side of the story. Just search this blog and you'll see a few posts..

Facts:

Kate having earpeice trouble during her interview. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGf3N3zjfzg

Kate admits to leaving Jon in Oct 2008.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw4okQKyH6M

Kaydar Online faking an email accusing Jon of trying to do a reality show with octomom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9UEMQ7MM4w; February 3, 2010 at 11:11 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: itsaboutthekids said...

Hailey or Kate would have the motive.

Hailey, pissed and angry over life, could have trashed Jon's place.

Kate, pissed over Jon for taking the kids away from filming, could have asked Hailey or someone to "search" Jon's apartment for that "contract" they signed back in Oct 2008.

Where Kate went up to Jon and said it was over. And according to Jodi in the interview, stated that Jon told her that Kate went up to Jon with a contract saying that he is to live his life, and she is to live hers. And that Jon can do whatever he wants as long as he continues filming.

Kate would be very interested in finding that contract and burning it.; February 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Remember when the DA was questioning Hailey? LOL, Everyone at Kaydar said she was innocent.

Now that the DA is questioning Jon, everyone at Kaydar is saying he's guilty. haha

Nice to see how the pick and choose whatever situation that fits their agenda.; February 3, 2010 at 11:20 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: Yes, the spinmeisters are at it again but that's okay. The truth always comes out in the end. Those ROL bloggers must be getting paid by the number of comments they make. LOL; February 3, 2010 at 11:31 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Those ROL commentators must be previous J&K filming staffs. They're sitting in the office right now bashing Jon all day.; February 3, 2010 at 11:39 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Jon is just going in for questioning. I don't know why they didn't question him earlier on but it's nothing serious.

It doesn't say that Jon is a "suspect". He's just going in to answer a few questions.

1) Do you have any enemies?
2) Do you know who would do this?
3) Does anyone have the keys to your apartment?
4) Where were you at the time of the incident?
5) I hear that you and Kate signed a secret contract. Do you still have it? Or is it missing after your apartment was ransacked?
6) Who else besides you and Hailey knew your apartment number?

Jon was with the kids Dec 23-26?
Haily move out her belongings on the 23-24.

Jon returned on the apartment on the 26.

Jon was seen on TAPE that he only stayed in his apartment no longer than 60 seconds.

All signs point to someone else.; February 3, 2010 at 1:29 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I wonder if anyone has considered the possibility that Jon has been called in because someone else is suspected in the break-in and they want to update him and get additional information? Jon is the one that filed the charges, isn't he?; February 3, 2010 at 2:27 PM
SG said... [Reply]: itsaboutthekids said...
LOL! I didn't mean to call you SchumeckyGirl. Honest! I just can't type. Sorry. I love and very much agree with your posts here, there and everywhere. :)
---------------------------------
LOL!! That was funny. And thanks!; February 3, 2010 at 2:30 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: itsaboutthekids said...

I wonder if anyone has considered the possibility that Jon has been called in because someone else is suspected in the break-in and they want to update him and get additional information? Jon is the one that filed the charges, isn't he?

----

The DA or the investigators should have questioned Jon in the very beginning. So, yes, maybe they are just talking to him to get updates and update him on the situation.

Will Jon have a lawyer present? We all know Hailey screamed and cried foul when the cops decided to question her and she demanded that her lawyer be present. (1st sign of guilt).

2nd sign of guilt was when she admitted to writing the note and taking the TV. (AFTER) the cameras showed her taking it.

She's also blabbing about slandering Jon on her twitter page. So yes, Hailey does have a motive.

What motives would Jon have? A publicity stunt? All Jon has to do for a publicity stunt is be with another woman or take parking lot photo-ops with his kids. Just like mommy dearest.; February 3, 2010 at 4:20 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Also, I just read that NY has a brand new DA so that could be why questioning is going on now. He might be wanting to get up to speed and get this case resolved sooner rather than later. I would guess he's going through all pending cases. Go to www.manhattanda.com for more info.; February 3, 2010 at 4:55 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: What? A new DA? I wonder if that 'new" DA is a paid TLC mole.; February 3, 2010 at 5:00 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I would hope the DA's not a mole. In the larger scheme of things, this isn't a real high profile case. More like a lover's spat gone wrong.

Do you know what Hailey said in the note? Was it her mom that said it was Hailey's writing?; February 3, 2010 at 5:44 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Not sure what it said in the note but it did refer to Jon as a "low-life".

And it was Hailey to admitted to writing the note to the police.

Source; February 3, 2010 at 5:56 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Haily also "bashes" Jon for his so called "relationship" with Kate Major. LOL

And months later what do we have? Hailey, Lohan and Kate Major drinking together!; February 3, 2010 at 6:00 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Thanks for the link. I knew I'd read it but all the details are getting blurry. So much has happened. It's crazy. Yes, too funny about the I hate Jon club. They aren't too obvious, are they? You would think they would grow up and move on. When this story really spills it's going to be some soap opera.

Did you see Santoro's most recent public tweets? Do you think she'd be right in there with them if she were invited?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MEDIAWHOREZ!!!! Ha. This is so funny.
6:38 PM Jan 29th from Echofon

I love how people that talked so much shit on each other and now bff's. Lol. If you all only knew.
11:54 AM Jan 24th from Echofon; February 3, 2010 at 6:33 PM
Not Anonymous said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...

What? A new DA? I wonder if that 'new" DA is a paid TLC mole.

---

Oooh, I think you're on to something. I'm sure that the new District Attorney for New York County, voted into office by the people of New York, is a TLC mole. TLC cares so much about destroying Jon Gosselin that they fixed an election. Right. And you wonder why people think you are nuts?; February 3, 2010 at 7:52 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: The only one crazy are those Kate fans sitting around attacking everyone that isn't as crazy as they are.; February 3, 2010 at 10:25 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Like I said, the DA questioning Jon is nothing out of the ordinary. What they should have done was question him at the very beginning of the incident.

---------

I bet TLC and Kate would love to have Jon arrested right? Maybe then they can continue with Kate Plus 8?

Seems like TLC currently do not have a clue of what they are going to do with Kate.

- No talent
- No charisma
- Nothing interesting about her besides having 8

TLC is bitter. Real bitter that Jon banned the kids from filming and protecting his kids from TLC and Kate.

TLC knows that Kate has no future in show business. She tried several times and failed.

- The View (Kate was awkward and looked out of place. Couldn't keep up with the current topics that didn't involved Kate or her kids). She's clueless and uninteresting.

- Kate on Jay Leno. LOL enough said.; February 3, 2010 at 11:46 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: So we get to see Kate on The View once again. March 11th is the red letter day. The question is, with or without extensions.

http://www.theinsider.com/news/3183268_Kate_Gosselin_Returns_to_The_View?ttag=twitter; February 4, 2010 at 8:50 AM
BeachMom said... [Reply]: itsaboutthekids said...
So we get to see Kate on The View once again
-----------------

Ugh...again? She was horrible last time.

I guess we can expect some sort of 'trash Jon' story a few days before so she has something to cry about on air again.; February 4, 2010 at 9:47 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: weblogs.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/zontv/

This is a link to Z's site on the Baltimore Sun online paper. It's an excellent place to read and blog about this issue as well as many of the current events. As of this morning there is an effort to organize a boycott of TLC, The View and many other sponsors, shows, etc. that are promoting Kate and child exploitation. It's a great site and a good place to vent your frustrations. You might want to check it out.; February 4, 2010 at 10:56 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Wow, the View MUST be desperate for cheap ratings for allow Kate to host again. WTF are they thinking?

Maybe this time they will ask her real questions?

Whooopi must be a little pissed right now.

Thanks for the link to zonTV, very interesting read.; February 4, 2010 at 12:49 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Not Anonymous said...
Oooh, I think you're on to something. I'm sure that the new District Attorney for New York County, voted into office by the people of New York, is a TLC mole. TLC cares so much about destroying Jon Gosselin that they fixed an election. Right. And you wonder why people think you are nuts?
-------

LOL, someone got a little "defensive" when I questioned the new DA. I wonder if Not Anonymous is Stephanie Ovadia. Maybe she is also connected to the new DA. Maybe she even follows him on twitter. LOL; February 4, 2010 at 12:57 PM
Not Anonymous said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...

Not Anonymous said...
Oooh, I think you're on to something. I'm sure that the new District Attorney for New York County, voted into office by the people of New York, is a TLC mole. TLC cares so much about destroying Jon Gosselin that they fixed an election. Right. And you wonder why people think you are nuts?
-------

LOL, someone got a little "defensive" when I questioned the new DA. I wonder if Not Anonymous is Stephanie Ovadia. Maybe she is also connected to the new DA. Maybe she even follows him on twitter. LOL

---

Hate to break it to you, but a) I do not know who Stephanie Ovadia is; b) I live on the other side of the country and have no connection to the NY DA; and c) don't follow anyone on Twitter.

I was simply pointing out the complete and utter ludicrousness of the idea that the new DA is a "TLC mole." Your paranoia is truly out of control if you actually believe that TLC has the power, ability and desire to fix a NY election in order to "get" Jon Gosselin. I hate to break it to you, but Jon Gosselin isn't that important. Neither is Kate Gosselin, before someone screams "Kate Fool" or some other absurdity. For goodness sakes, they're reality show stars and tabloid favorites. Nothing more. There actually are people in this world who don't give a crap about the Gosselin saga and -- gasp -- may not even have heard of them.

It may be asking a lot...but try to think *rationally* for a change.; February 4, 2010 at 1:30 PM
SG said... [Reply]: While I am totally against the children being back on TV what is the reasoning behind the boycott of TLC if the children are no longer being filmed?

While I'm not sure Kate deserves her own show I'm not sure that she doesn't have a right to try it. If it crashes and burns then so be it and it's well deserved, but if it is very successful at least she has a way to support her 8 children since she so obviously is never going back to nursing.

As long as the children aren't being filmed why the boycott? Unless it is against the boycott of all their shows with children on it. I'm all for that!

I'm not sure why people are against Kate going on The View either as long as her children aren't on TV. Hopefully she won't use it as a platform to badmouth Jon but if she does it will only make her look bad.

I personally don't think Kate deserves her own show but if it happens, it happens.

Now if people just hate her and want to see her fail that's another story. They have every right to feel that way if that's the way they feel. I just don't see a boycott because you hate Kate as something that will work.; February 4, 2010 at 2:32 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: SchmeckyGirl said...

---

I agree. Kate should at least try to have her own show. I am not against that. And if she's successful at it, then good for her and for the kids. (The more time Kate spends away from the kids the better). No different than how it is now. Besides Kate grabbing the kids 1 day out of the week for a photo-op.

But, in all honestly, I don't see how Kate can be successful at her own show. Maybe it will be a huge wakeup call for this poor woman who has been around all these "yes ma'am) telling her everything she wants to hear.

It is better to try and and fail, then to not try at all. In the mean time, we all can laugh as she tries to be a "celebrity". Or, her pathetic attempt at trying to be a "milf".

If Hailey says that Kate can now be a "milf" with her new hairdo. Funny how as time passes by, we get to see a connection between Kate, Skanktoro and Hailey.; February 4, 2010 at 3:29 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: SchmeckyGirl said...
While I am totally against the children being back on TV what is the reasoning behind the boycott of TLC if the children are no longer being filmed?

Yes, the kids are off the air right now but many, including myself, believe that much of the pressure they're putting on Jon, forcing him out of media work, and all the slanted, derogatory reporting against him as a father is in an effort to force him to let the kids film once again. They are effectively taking away his options. No decent job, high child support, lawsuits and legal fees out the ying yang. It all adds up to drag him down. Kate has been very vocal about wanting the kids back on TV and seems to be supporting TLC's efforts to break Jon and make him give up the kids for filming. My concern is that they would go so far as to try and prove Jon an unfit father. Where does that leave the kids? How much more trauma and drama can they handle in their lives? click on this link, Life and Style, and it will take you to the most current article written about Jon. This just came out today. There's quotes from a media psychotherapist, from ex-nanny santoro who seems to know everything, etc. You get the idea. It's been done before.

http://preesi.lefora.com/2010/02/04/life-and-style-scan-february-15th-2010-only-one/#post7

"Absentee Dad Jon Gosselin - What's He Been Missing Out On?"

"The father of eight now sees his children about once a week---but when he's in town he seems more interested in local nightlife than hanging out at home."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

While I'm not sure Kate deserves her own show I'm not sure that she doesn't have a right to try it. If it crashes and burns then so be it and it's well deserved, but if it is very successful at least she has a way to support her 8 children since she so obviously is never going back to nursing.

I don't hate Kate, but I sure don't like her much. And sure she has the right to try and then flop or not I suppose. I think the biggest objection isn't that people don't want her to succeed, It's that she trampled on and over the backs of her husband and children to get where she is. As soon as she thought she could get along with just the children, she dumped Jon. I'm sure she never thought Jon would pull the kids off the show. Otherwise she would have strung him along some more. Not very good planning on her part. She can go back to nursing, or anything else if she has to...even McDonald's. Join the rest of the working world. There are many families with lots of kids and they might not live high on the hog, but they do okay. If they would let Jon accept decent jobs he could pay higher child support and she wouldn't need as much. Kate just seems to think she has earned and "deserves" special Consideration. Not so.

I'll add more in a bit. Check out the magazine link.; February 4, 2010 at 3:55 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Are those anti-Jon statements from TLC or the writers for the magazine?

From what I can see, those are just "spins". If they actually watched the show, they will know who the kids love to be around with and which parent spends more QUALITY time with the kids.

Funny who they PURPOSELY left out the SLED pictures of Jon and the kids.

Where was Kate when Jon and the kids were playing on the snow?

Where are the pictures of Steve and family visiting Kate? LOL

Nice try. I think it's just "good business" to bash Jon.

Look Hailey, Skanktoro, Kate Major. They were a bunch of NOBODIES. After they joined the "bash Jon bandwagon", they got their 15 minutes of fame. Just shows how much attention Jon gets and Kate is jealous of it.

TLC can throw her on every media appearance they want, but she will never be as likable as Jon. Kate is actually starting to annoy people. Good job Kate and TLC. Keep milking your 15mins.; February 4, 2010 at 4:02 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: TLC wants to destroy Jon and Kate doesn't really care. Shows you how much Kate really cares about the kids.

Jon has never really bashed Kate or TLC. Kate and TLC is taking this Jon-Bashing to another level. Kate and TLC just can't seem to MOVE ON, LET GO, etc etc.

Why can't the both of them build a bridge and get over it?

Some kind of mother Kate is.

People who need to just let it go:

1) Kate Gosseoin
2) Kate Major
3) Hailey Glassman
4) Lohan
5) Skanktoro (she seemed pretty quiet after getting paid for her lies)

The only one out of this MESS who seemed to move forward is JG. His twitters isn't full of hate messages to the world. He hasn't attacked anyone. Looks like he's moving on with life.

And those idiots mentioned above, are jealous of it.; February 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM
SG said... [Reply]: itsaboutthekids,

I totally agree with you. I personally don't feel that Kate deserves a show either. I personally don't think that anyone who treated their spouse that way deserves to be rewarded with a tv show, but I won't try to stop her because my concern was the children being filmed. I do however think it may be an interesting train wreck to watch. Who knows, she may actually be successful. I will at least be happy that the children will be taken care of.

I do agree that TLC will try to get the children filmed again but I personally don't see that happening because they didn't have the proper permits and didn't pay the children, and child activists are now vocal about being against it, etc. They will just look bad if they put those kids back on tv in my opinion.

As for that magazine article in the link you sent it was really disgusting how they twist things. Jon took those kids out to play in the snow. Notice it says they were out alone that day... Kate wasn't with them. She's never taken them out in the snow to play.

And why are they quoting Stephanie Santoro???

So Jon took a week's vacation... it's not like he could take the kids with him anyway because they are in school.

I wish people would follow both Jon and Kate 24/7 so the real truth, whatever it is, will be out there. Maybe Jon really is never with the kids or spends time with them, but nothing they showed proves that. I do hope Jon spends time with his children and isn't putting them on the back burner. Hopefully we will see pics of him with the kids soon. But just because we don't see the pics doesn't mean he isn't. It's just frustrating when the truth is twisted.; February 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: The statements aren't quotes from
TLC as far as I know and probably spin from the writers. (It's hard to read the print sometimes) But I always assume TLC has a hand in everything, even if it's just creating the negative energy around Jon to suggest the spin. I think Kate's recorded mundane outings the last few days was a reponse to blog comments which happened to play into a set-up for this article. Kate, the be all, do all, end all for the kids.

The fact is, paparazzi do not stand out in the cold at the front door of the grocery store in Rodeo Drive, PA unless they KNOW there's going to be someone there to photograph.; February 4, 2010 at 4:26 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I hadn't thought about the permit situation and you could be right. It just seems TLC has their scorched earth lawyers and a vendetta against Jon that's eating away at them and they'll stop at nothing. They're so furious that they couldn't control Jon. Kind of funny in a way. Everyone thought he was a laid back sort of guy and here he is holding TLC by the balls. (sorry, I just had to say that).

You know, if TLC would have played this right they could have come out the good guys and smelling like a rose. I think they got just as greedy and didn't want to give anything up. I wonder what they promised Kate to get her to turn on Jon?

Yes, the magazine article...turned my stomach. I'm not sure how much more Jon can take. He's already stronger than I thought he could be.; February 4, 2010 at 4:37 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: SchmeckyGirl. Think about how much you love your children. Do you think divorce, or no divorce, hell or high water, would keep you from being there for them when it's most important? Jon is limited by the divorce/custody agreement. I believe he loves those children more than he loves himself and would do anything for them. Not to say mistakes aren't made, but don't we all. It's what's in the heart that counts.; February 4, 2010 at 4:41 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: JJ, your new issue volume 3...
Bwahahahaha. It's just too cute. I especially like the tag line "We can make stuff up too". Looks just like Life and Style in reverse.; February 4, 2010 at 5:25 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: JJ- You've gotta check this out. The article in Life and Style...the
Backyard Fun picture is in sosugary on Jan 16th. Guess who's playing with the kids in the other views?

http://gosselins.sosugary.com/thumbnails.php?album=379

Backyard Fun picture above caption : "When filming Jon & Kate plus Eight, Jon often spent quality time with his kids in their backyard. Now the children play there alone."

Looks to me like this picture is included in one of the 8 views on sosugary.com January 16 - Playtime "Jon plays with the kids out front of their PA home."

Jon is in FOUR of the photos on this day. He's with the kids outside playing. This caption under Backyard Fun says the kids were alone. No Comment.; February 4, 2010 at 7:34 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: itsaboutthekids said...

JJ- You've gotta check this out. The article in Life and Style...the
Backyard Fun picture is in sosugary on Jan 16th. Guess who's playing with the kids in the other views?

http://gosselins.sosugary.com/thumbnails.php?album=379

---

LOL, I noticed that too. When I saw that magazine scan, and so the kids playing in the snow, I thought to myself, "I could have sworn Jon was with the kids when those pictures were taken".

Again, good eyes!

Hopefully everyone else will SEE the SPIN.

Someone should send that magazine an email, or make a post showing that Jon was there.

Did you post those pics on Pressi sites?; February 4, 2010 at 7:46 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: yes, I post the link and the copied the same info both places.

What Jerks!; February 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Would you just double check the photos? I couldn't believe they would be so brazen and thought I was imagining things. Just check me out on this and make sure you see the same thing. Actually I was looking for something else when I ran across this photo.; February 4, 2010 at 7:54 PM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: Schmecky Girl I agree with your just because they don't have pictures doesn't mean he isn't spending time with them. So why doesn't it apply to Kate. Just because you don't see her playing with the kids doesn't mean she isn't.

The only team I am on is the kids.

JJ

Jon isn't twittering or talking because he can't. Remember the lawsuit??

I feel pretty sure if he wasn't under orders to keep his mouth shut he would be right out there with the rest of them.

Exactly how many days has he been in Utah now?; February 4, 2010 at 7:54 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: LOL, the Media ban doesn't prevent him from "twittering".

The Media ban prevents Jon from making "paid" appearances and doing TV interviews.

-----------

And yes, those are the same pictures. The one where the kids were poking at the ground, Jon was there on the side near the "apartment" door.

They were taken the same day. Life and Style magazine just got caught in a lie.

And it is pretty obvious they were bashing Jon on purpose. They act like Jon never pick up the kids or drop them off.

That article just made me lol while reading it. So much BS.

If this is what TLC and Kate has to do to make Kate look good, then by all means, KEEP lying.; February 4, 2010 at 8:05 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: Ugh, she's going to be on The View again?! When Kate told Leno that she "wants to laugh at herself", she meant it. She knows that she's going to have to make an ass out of herself if she wants to be on TV. Otherwise, not many people are going to watch her. I would not mind seeing Whoopi Goldberg get up and deck her.; February 4, 2010 at 8:42 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: LOL, I wonder what Kate is going to do on the View? Guest hosts? Maybe this time Kate will wear an earpiece? She can now easily hide it with her long hair.

I hope Whoopi rips Kate a new one. Heck, even Lisa Ling would give Kate a huge wake-up call. The rest of the ladies on the view are butt kissers.; February 4, 2010 at 8:51 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I would not mind seeing Whoopi Goldberg get up and deck her.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Heehee... I read this suggestion on another blog. It seems to be a favorite. Knowing Whoopi, it might just happen. She doesn't pull any punches.; February 4, 2010 at 8:51 PM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: The only one out of this MESS who seemed to move forward is JG. His twitters isn't full of hate messages to the world. He hasn't attacked anyone. Looks like he's moving on with life.

He has moved on alright. How many weeks has it been since he has seen the kids? Old Jon is hiding out in Utah so he doesn't have to face the DA in New York for trashing his own apartment.

Jon Gosselin, what a joke. I can't imagine the shame the kids must have because of him.; February 4, 2010 at 9:05 PM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: itsaboutthekids said...
I would not mind seeing Whoopi Goldberg get up and deck her.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Someone needs to ask Whoopi about her own daughters screwed up life. Before she bashes Kate she should own up to what a poor mother she was to her own daughter.; February 4, 2010 at 9:07 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Jon still talks to the kids on the phone. And when they do see him, you bet they will have a huge smile on their faces.

Now, when was the last time Kate actually spent some time with the kids?

We see Jon taking them on a sled ride. I bet the kids will have that in their memory compared to the smack on the face Colin received.

And speaking of how long has it been since Jon seen him, how do you know he hasn't? Wasn't it just a week or 2 ago where Jon took the kids to see Jodi and Kevin?

I mean, of course you're not going to bring up the fact that Kate went missing for weeks while she traveled and promoted her books. And YOU bet she NEVER called the kids to say hi to them.

It's pretty obvious that Jon has a better relationship with the kids.

I mean, we can find hundreds of clips and pictures of the kids running to Jon, smiling, laughing, etc etc.

At the same time, we can also find thousands of pictures or videos of Kate yelling and abusing her kids or Jon.

The more you know!; February 4, 2010 at 9:11 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Anyone know what happened to TVsnark? I can't access that blog for some reason.; February 4, 2010 at 9:44 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: Anonymous said...
Someone needs to ask Whoopi about her own daughters screwed up life.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Someone like who? Whoopi is not trying to horn in on other people's shows.

Whoopi is not subjecting herself to interviews that are not going to turn out well for her.

WHOOPI apparently has the good sense to not try to present herself as a model mother.

Kate does not see herself realistically. She's too grandiose. She tries to present herself as something she's not. She is a lightweight, but she keeps trying to get in the ring with heavyweights -- and then she wonders why she got pounded.; February 5, 2010 at 1:11 AM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...

The rest of the ladies on the view are butt kissers.
---------------

They ARE. Or maybe they're ignorant, and don't know that Kate would throw them under the bus in a heartbeat.; February 5, 2010 at 1:25 AM
Sara in Canada said... [Reply]: I found this blog by accident, and I can't believe how extremely ignorant the blog owner is.
I'm not a fan of any of the Gosselins, but I do know that blogs like this are extraordinarily harmful to their family, especially the children.
You should be ashamed of yourself, whoever you are.; February 5, 2010 at 7:11 AM
Dianew said... [Reply]: Sara in Canada said...
I found this blog by accident, and I can't believe how extremely ignorant the blog owner is.
@@@@@@@@@@@
Sarah, with all due respect, it is the parents of these 8 children who are ignorant.; February 5, 2010 at 7:53 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: Sara in Canada said...

I found this blog by accident, and I can't believe how extremely ignorant the blog owner is.
I'm not a fan of any of the Gosselins, but I do know that blogs like this are extraordinarily harmful to their family, especially the children.
You should be ashamed of yourself, whoever you are.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You certainly have a right to feel how you feel. We all do.

How do you feel about children being filmed in their home, on the potty, in the tub, sometimes half dressed, in the kitchen, playroom, living room, in their yard, on the streets, at the bus stop, in the stores, at tumbling lessons, cooking lessons, swim lessons, at the park, at church (when mom doesn't find it too hard to go), on vacations, on and on and on. Cameras literally following their every move hours a day, several days a week, week after week, year after year. Without family or relatives in sight or in their lives because mom has separated them from the rest of the family. All of this because mom and dad think this is the only way they can make enough money to clothe and feed them (even though much of this is donated because of product placement during filming). The children have become walking, breathing product ads and mom and dad get free "stuff" in exchange.

Would you think this might be harmful to these children?

If you do think this is harmful would you be willing to drop by TLC's website and tell them they should be ashamed of exploiting a family this way. And all the other families they exploit with their programming. If they would stop doing that, this blog would go away.; February 5, 2010 at 8:27 AM
just wondering said... [Reply]: jj.. Snarkie has gone private. You have to sign in to access her blog for now.

Re Kate: I have this sinking feeling that Kate will be announcing her new show while on The View and rumor has it that she has (ghost written, of course) a (completely fabricated) tell all book coming out.; February 5, 2010 at 11:27 AM
SG said... [Reply]: LMAO!! I usually try to stay away from the "snarky" stuff but that magazine cover you created was great! If Life & Style can do it then so can you!; February 5, 2010 at 12:01 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Re Kate: I have this sinking feeling that Kate will be announcing her new show while on The View and rumor has it that she has (ghost written, of course) a (completely fabricated) tell all book coming out.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, and she'll probably make a million bucks.

One the plus side, once the book is in print it can be pulled apart piece by piece with all of her half-baked truths revealed and then Jon can write a sequel.... Jon & Kate plus Eight --- The REAL Story. LOL

Kate's right (can't believe I said that), it' too late to go back in some respects, but I sure would like to have the truth revealed of what happened while she was back there.; February 5, 2010 at 12:22 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Sara in Canada said...
------------

Obviously this person didn't get that the "sheeple cover" was a parody of the life and style magazine.

If you think that was "insane", you should take a good look at the magazine's blatant lies about Jon.; February 5, 2010 at 12:43 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Kaydar just posted an article stating that Jon will allow the kids to film, if TLC drops it's lawsuit.

-----

This is what the LAWSUIT was all about. It was never about the breach of contract.

Jon can use this to his advantage. If TLC does drop the lawsuit, Jon can then say, GOTCHA! The kids will not FILM and I just proved that TLC only wanted to sue me because I took the kids away.; February 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: OrderlyL said...
jibberjabbers said...

The rest of the ladies on the view are butt kissers.
---------------

They ARE. Or maybe they're ignorant, and don't know that Kate would throw them under the bus in a heartbeat.

ADD: Oh, my god!! I just realized, I think Kate's whole problem is stupidity. There's a possibly that I would even concede that she's not mentally ill, in favor of the argument that she's just an idiot. I believe that's why she married Jon -- in an attempt to balance her idiocy.

At times, Jon would try to correct Kate's misconceptions -- off the top of my head, there was something stupid that she said during the episode where Jon took Mady and Cara hiking up that rock, Boro Rock, or whatever the name of it was. I don't recall exactly, but as usual Kate brushed Jon off when he corrected her.

Jon's not stupid; he possesses quite a lot of knowledge. But I guess it would take a genius in order to balance Kate's level of idiocy. Eventually she figured that out...; February 5, 2010 at 12:58 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: ^ I have a clip of Kate correcting Jon and then she retracts after realizing Jon was right.

She didn't even apologize after interrupting Jon. When Jon interrupted Kate, Kate WENT CRAZY PSYCHO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1cZDZz_kTc; February 5, 2010 at 1:02 PM
Not Anonymous said... [Reply]: Sara in Canada said...

I found this blog by accident, and I can't believe how extremely ignorant the blog owner is.
I'm not a fan of any of the Gosselins, but I do know that blogs like this are extraordinarily harmful to their family, especially the children.
You should be ashamed of yourself, whoever you are.
---
Good luck with that argument around here, Sara. You have entered a parallel universe, one in which comparing Kate Gosselin to a horse is done in the name of "child advocacy." You sound rational, which won't get you far in these parts.; February 5, 2010 at 1:05 PM
jibberjabesr said... [Reply]: Kate Gosselin is a horse. LOL, Look at the pictures.

But that is besides the point. Not only did she make an ass of herself in that 10 minute clip, she also abuses her child, her husband and she has NO relationship with her parent.

SHOWS you what type of person Kate Gosslein is.; February 5, 2010 at 1:12 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Where does Kaydar get their info if Jon is no longer allowed to talk about anything regarding the show, his family, etc etc?

More fabricated news from Kaydar to get hits?; February 5, 2010 at 3:57 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...
Where does Kaydar get their info if Jon is no longer allowed to talk about anything regarding the show, his family, etc etc?

More fabricated news from Kaydar to get hits?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That crossed my mind too. I also noticed the big breaking news came at exactly 8:00 a.m. this morning on ROL's site. The standard ROL let's trash Jon / celebrate Kate spin the news time. Just in time for the weekend. Of course, it used to be because there was a Monday night show...LOL; February 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2010/02/05/jon-gosselin-kate-major-hailey-glassman/

Kate Major / Hailey Glassman friends?; February 5, 2010 at 5:00 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: ^ Not a shocker. I mean, if you go to their twitter page, they're all friends with the same lawyer.; February 5, 2010 at 5:19 PM
BeachMom said... [Reply]: Ok, it's a snowy day here on the East Coast, does anyone have time to explain the whole Matt Heckman saga with Reality Without Apologies, Gosselins Without Pity, Musings From The Moon, The Dirty Disher, TVSnark, JenD, Dana Hoffman, The Reading Eagle, Julie Kreider, Merry and Torin Rozzelle and the Bob Schmuck virus issue?

My Gosselin gossip comes from 2 sites (3 now with this blog) ROL and GWOP. I mostly lurk at GWOP, only posting occasionally (I find the post delay there VERY annoying) and I gave up trying to post at ROL some time ago since those ROL posters are quite unstable. I've read posts about the FBI, IRS and criminal charges, what the heck is that all about? I would hope these agencies are dealing with our countries more pressing issues at hand rather than wasting their time on Gosselin drama.

I am aware of why GWOP was started but not sure how it escalated from there with all these other blogs and where the heck did some of these lunatics come from? Anyone care to explain?; February 6, 2010 at 5:54 AM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: Beachmom why are you spreading people's legal names across the web? What is your purpose for doing so?

ANd I can't believe that you don't know anything about this at all. You clearly know where to go to read all about it and I would surmise you have and are just here to spread crap.

What an ASS.; February 6, 2010 at 9:50 AM
KateRox said... [Reply]: Schmeckygirl,
You said no one follows Jon 24/7 so we can't know how much he is with the kids. In the very same comment you said Kate never played in the snow with the kids. Do you follow Kate 24/7?; February 6, 2010 at 10:50 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...
Kaydar just posted an article stating that Jon will allow the kids to film, if TLC drops it's lawsuit.

-----

This is what the LAWSUIT was all about. It was never about the breach of contract.

Jon can use this to his advantage. If TLC does drop the lawsuit, Jon can then say, GOTCHA! The kids will not FILM and I just proved that TLC only wanted to sue me because I took the kids away.

~~~~~~~~~~

...and you, TLC, agreed that either parent could stop the filming at any time, so the intent for your lawsuit against me is being misrepresented and therefore invalid.

Is my thinking on that correct, jj? I'm sure there's better legal terms if it is. I'm just trying to make sense of this theory.; February 6, 2010 at 11:34 AM
just wondering said... [Reply]: BeachMom.. I don't have the time to explain the entire Moon/Heckman/Snark fiasco, but if you go to Pat's site the entire mess is being discussed with posts from both Moon and Pat. Here is the link:

http://thedirtydisher.blogspot.com/; February 6, 2010 at 11:36 AM
just wondering said... [Reply]: Oh.. You have to scroll down a couple of threads to the place where the paypal receipts have been pasted.; February 6, 2010 at 11:37 AM
BeachMom said... [Reply]: Anonymous said...
Beachmom why are you spreading people's legal names across the web?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

WTF!! Spreading people’s legal names, you have GOT to be kidding right? These blogs are FULL of people’s ‘legal’ names you stupid twat.

I asked about those people/sites due to a post by someone on this blog asking why they couldn't access TVSnark. I did a google search for TVSnark to find out what it was, and up popped wordpress. A wordpress search for TVSnark produced a Matt Heckman blog, whose name I have heard passed around on GWOP and ROL. On his blog, he had a scathing post in which he mentioned all of the names mentioned, some of whom I have heard passed around GWOP and ROL. Since I HAVE NO IDEA what all the apparent bullshit DRAMA between all of them is about, I thought I would ask here. Excuse me for thinking that a message board was a perfect forum to open up a discussion about it.

So, Anonymous, kiss my ass you nasty bitch.; February 6, 2010 at 11:45 AM
just wondering said... [Reply]: WTF!! Spreading people’s legal names, you have GOT to be kidding right? These blogs are FULL of people’s ‘legal’ names you stupid twat.
****************

Thank you sooooo much for my biggest laugh of the day!!

Good Lord!! None of these people are exactly in the dark any more!!; February 6, 2010 at 12:03 PM
SG said... [Reply]: KateRox said...
Schmeckygirl,
You said no one follows Jon 24/7 so we can't know how much he is with the kids. In the very same comment you said Kate never played in the snow with the kids. Do you follow Kate 24/7?
-----------------------------------

I was referring to when Kate was on the show. She herself said she doesn't like to go out in the snow. She hates it. She would stay inside while Jon took the kids outside to play.

I post on other blogs and I've always said that just because we don't see pics of Jon OR Kate taking the kids out doesn't mean that they don't.

However, I will say that I personally believe that IF there were pics of Kate out playing in the snow with her kids we would see them. We saw a ton of her in the summer with them on their property. When Kate had the kids they went out to play in the snow with the nanny. I saw the pics of that.

So again, I am going by what Kate said herself. Taking the kids out to play in the snow is not something she likes to do.; February 6, 2010 at 12:28 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Matt Heckman does his own job at spreading his "legal name".

He's also a cyber stalker. Go to his blog and you can read all about it.

------------

itsaboutthekids said,

...and you, TLC, agreed that either parent could stop the filming at any time, so the intent for your lawsuit against me is being misrepresented and therefore invalid.

Is my thinking on that correct, jj? I'm sure there's better legal terms if it is. I'm just trying to make sense of this theory.

----------

Yes the contract did state that if either parent found the show to be detrimental to the kids, either parent can stop the show at any time.

TLC only case against Jon is "breach of contract". So they are using that part of the contract get back at Jon.

I mean, notice how Kate is free to do interviews, and go on different shows, YET, when Jon does it, it's a "breach of contract".

TLC is only saying it's a breach of contract because Jon kicked TLC out of his home.

Before Jon kicked TLC out of his him, Jon was doing several TV interviews.

TLC even made a public statement against Jon when he was on his way to the Larry King Interview.

WHY didn't TLC say "No Jon, you cannot do this interview or else it would be a breach of contract".

It wasn't a breach of contract until Jon successfully removed his kids from filming.

Plain and simple.; February 6, 2010 at 12:41 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Kate doesn't like the snow she stated it several times. But honestly, I don't know what to believe. Kate use to be afraid of heights.; February 6, 2010 at 1:11 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: I get so sick of seeing Kate Fools accusing non-Fool bloggers of "exploiting" the Gosselin children, and thus being hypocrites, that sometimes I tell them that they need a vocabulary lesson. I'll post the dictionary definition "Exploit = to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage. Example: exploiting migrant farm workers." and challenge the Fools to explain how it is MEAN or UNFAIR to the Gosselin kids to use pictures of them on a blog -- does it bother the kids or cause them problems, is it unreasonable or unusual to post pictures of the subject matter, etc. It usually shuts them up. They're typically really stupid and have short attention spans, so you have to break things down for them.; February 6, 2010 at 1:13 PM
just wondering said... [Reply]: I just read that Heckman's wife is buddies with the Santoro's on Facebook and Myspace. Don't know if anyone is interested in that or not, but it wouldn't surprise me at all.; February 6, 2010 at 1:18 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: ^
That's because they have nothing else to say about us. So they make up crap just like the sites they worship as if it were the bible.; February 6, 2010 at 1:21 PM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: Well, then Beachygirl you knew all about it and came here to spread it around a little more, you ***.

It is interesting that Matt Heckman's Wife and Mother are friends with the entire Santoro family on Facebook.

The plot certainly DOES thicken.

Beachygirl, didn't you used to post on Moon's old site?; February 6, 2010 at 1:44 PM
BeachMom said... [Reply]: Anonymous said...
Well, then Beachygirl you knew all about it and came here to spread it around a little more, you ***.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I am going to assume that you are addressing this to me and again, I say WTF! How am I spreading anything around?? Apparently, unlike you, I do not live and breath the Gosselins so I am not up on all the latest drama. After reading some posts on the dirtydish link, I’m not sure I want to surround myself with such negative energy anyway.

I’m also guessing from your reaction that you are either one of the people directly involve in this high school drama or close to someone who is involved. After reading some of the dirtydish, I have to say that is some f’d up shit. I mean, we are all adults, right? Life is too short to play such f’d up games with people we don’t even know. I still have no idea what started such hatred but coming in on the end of it, it's none of my business anyway. I try not to judge anyone from blog posts or gossip site, except the freaks at ROL since I am convinced are delusional mental ward patients.

I have never posted on Matt Heckman’s blog. I have posted on ROL and GWOP. Do not spread untrue rumors about me just because you’re a hate filled, spiteful POS.

I apologize if I ruffled feathers; it was just any innocent question…..sheeesshh!; February 6, 2010 at 2:46 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Let's all calm down and refrain from personal attacks aimed at one another. Thank you.

Anyone notice how Kate chomping on her gum, looks a lot like this.; February 6, 2010 at 2:50 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: http://www.x17online.com/index.php?page=2

x17 online
25 second video of Kate coming out of Butter; February 6, 2010 at 2:54 PM
SG said... [Reply]: The stylist had to do damage control (literally) and fix her hair. His reputation was at stake with the way Kate styled it into stripper hair. He is probably catching a lot of flack for her hair. He probably called the paps himself so people could see that he styled it better for her.; February 6, 2010 at 4:19 PM
BeachMom said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...
Let's all calm down and refrain from personal attacks aimed at one another. Thank you.

Anyone notice how Kate chomping on her gum, looks a lot like this.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Too funny!! Thanks for lightening my mood.

Apologies for the foul explosion. Again, I did not intend to rub anyone the wrong way.; February 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I don't see Steve the body guard in these photos. Do you think he's around and staying out of sight? Or just no longer in Kate's world?; February 6, 2010 at 6:40 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: ^
Maybe the paps told Lurch to get out of the shot.; February 6, 2010 at 8:57 PM
just wondering said... [Reply]: Love that straight jacket! If only...; February 6, 2010 at 10:18 PM
$PSA announcement\\$ PSA announcement\\ said... [Reply]: Snark's blog is back up. She needed a break. DD's is one side. Snark made a mistake and copped to it.; February 7, 2010 at 12:50 AM
8XploitedFaces said... [Reply]: Someone needs to ask Whoopi about her own daughters screwed up life
------------------

Does this mean you will put full blame on the futures of these 8 little kids?

Time will tell and then we can watch you praise the Mother of the Year.; February 7, 2010 at 12:57 AM
BeachMom said... [Reply]: SchmeckyGirl said...
The stylist had to do damage control (literally) and fix her hair.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yes, those photos look like some of the bulk in her hair is gone. Maybe the extensions were so matted by the time the stylist got to it they had to remove some of them.

What mystery man are they referring to?; February 7, 2010 at 4:26 AM
Paula Caldarella said... [Reply]: Poor Ted Gibson - his reputation is taking a beating. I'll bet when TLC ordered him to put extensions in Kate's hair, he had no clue as to had bad this all would go for him.; February 7, 2010 at 4:47 AM
KateRox said... [Reply]: "Taking the kids out to play in the snow is not something she likes to do."

That's different than she NEVER plays with the kids in the snow. How would you know? I can't stand the cold and snow either but I play with my kids in the snow for hours.

Now you are saying if it happened then we'd see pics of it? So you DO follow Kate 24/7? No you don't. No one does. The only way a pap can get photos of the kids playing in parts of the yard is if Jon lets them on the property. That had to be addressed in the divorce settlement.

You said elsewhere that Kate didn't go Halloweening with the kids, but she did. You want pics to believe it's true.

People who demand pics for every. little. normal. thing. are the people who fuel the paparazzi snapping bus photos of these kids.

Do you know where the paps are when the kids are at home? I do, and it's awful. Hooray for the snow that sent paps to their hotels.

Ok, now, back to your different standards for other mothers.; February 7, 2010 at 5:35 AM
Paula Caldarella said... [Reply]: Ok, now, back to your different standards for other mothers.

Kind of like your double standard with Jon? How do you feel about the pictures of Kate in NYC?; February 7, 2010 at 6:33 AM
SG said... [Reply]: KateRox,

I will say it again:
I post on other blogs and I've always said that just because we don't see pics of Jon OR Kate taking the kids out doesn't mean that they don't.

However, I will say that I personally believe that IF there were pics of Kate out playing in the snow with her kids we would see them. We saw a ton of her in the summer with them on their property. When Kate had the kids they went out to play in the snow with the nanny. I saw the pics of that. (And Jon wasn't home at the time so he didn't let them on the property.)

I'm not saying I know for a fact Kate doesn't take them out in the snow. I just said I personally don't think she does. I could be wrong.

As for the trick or treating, I'm just not sure I believe that either. Unless you know Kate or saw her take them with your own eyes then you don't know for a fact either. Just because an "anonymous source" said it doesn't make it true. Even if a named source, like her friend Jamie said it, it doesn't make it true.

I also don't believe that Jon has to let them on the property for the paps to take pics of them. Kate doesn't and there were so many pics of them over the summer together. I'm also not saying that he doesn't let them on the property. I just don't think you can tell by the pics because they are taken with zoom lenses.

As for the paps pictures vs. TLC filming I PERSONALLY don't see a difference. They are both an invasion of privacy. Kate and/or Jon may have invited the TLC cameras into their lives but the children didn't.

But yes, you are right, I don't know for a fact that Kate does not take them out to play in the snow. But I never said I did, nor did I mean to give the impression that I did.; February 7, 2010 at 7:13 AM
SG said... [Reply]: BeachMom,

The mystery man they were referring to was Ted Gibson, the hairstylist that gave her the extensions. I'm not sure why they thought he was a mystery, he was all over the media talking about her hair.; February 7, 2010 at 7:23 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: KateRox said...
Do you know where the paps are when the kids are at home? I do, and it's awful. Hooray for the snow that sent paps to their hotels.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Are you saying you are a witness to this? Are you a friend, family member or neighbor of Kate's? I'm just asking because if you are, maybe you could share what's really going on there and what you've seen.; February 7, 2010 at 8:58 AM
Paula Caldarella said... [Reply]: I don't believe there are paps in PA - just TLC-paid photographers who are summoned when TLC needs pictures of Kate or a way to put a negative spin on Jon. Sorry, the paps don't spend too much time and energy chasing around a neurotic woman in a small PA town.; February 7, 2010 at 9:24 AM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: Anonymous KateRox said...

People who demand pics for every. little. normal. thing. are the people who fuel the paparazzi snapping bus photos of these kids.
-------------

Giving birth to six babies at one time is extremely far from being an every. little. normal. thing., and the mother who went to great lengths to put them in the spotlight -- and would continue to, if she could -- is the one who is responsible for the media attention, whether or not she likes that consequence and whether or not she anticipated it.; February 7, 2010 at 10:30 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: The difference between Paps and TLC cameras. TLC were allowed to go into their homes and film almost everything.

Paps are only allowed to take pics of what they can in public.

TLC invaded the children's privacy. I mean some of the shots were just over the top.

Kate isn't any better. She took pictures of the kids doing their thing in the potty, then took pictures of the "remains" and pasted right next to the kids picture in the photo album.

How disgusting is that? How embarrassing is that for the kids?

-----------

And I don't think Kate has every played with the kids in the snow. Heck, she didn't even play with them in the park because it was 900 millions degrees that day. (Farm to Table).

It's either too hot or too cold. Kate always has an excuse not to play with them. The only thing she does for sure is scream and them and yell out orders.

Honestly, when does Kate ever spend quality time with them? Sure she picks them up or drop them off. Take them out of class to "run errands". But the 8 kids are growing fast. And once they hit their teen years, they will start hanging out with their own friends.

Kate has missed out on spending times with her kids. She's too busy trying to be a celebrity. Those bus pick up don't mean jack. Show me one pic or a clip of the kids running to Kate to give her a hug.

I can't find any. There are plenty of those of Jon.

What can we find of Kate? Her screaming or hitting her kids.; February 7, 2010 at 11:20 AM
BeachMom said... [Reply]: Yes, I agree that the paps are most definitely tipped off by TLC. No way could they afford to camp out in PA for a shot or two of Kate, Jon or the kids. IMO people are more interested in seeing photos of Kate or Jon doing something foolish than ones of the kids growing up. I guess that’s a good deal for the kids though since it enables them to fade into the background while their parents make boobs of themselves.

Also, those pictures of Kate in NYC were so staged. I live about an hour outside of NYC and go into the city quite often for plays, shopping or just people watching and NO ONE dresses like that in the winter. It’s cold here and everyone is bundled up. We just got smacked with 2 feet of snow again yesterday. What kind of mother leaves her children for the night when there are blizzard conditions outside? JMHO but it seems a bit irresponsible to me.; February 7, 2010 at 11:22 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Of course it was staged. Why else would Kate wear what she wore that night. It was freezing cold.; February 7, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: BeachMom said...

What kind of mother leaves her children for the night when there are blizzard conditions outside? JMHO but it seems a bit irresponsible to me.

---

Maybe one whose ex-husband had custody of the children so she did not have the option to be with them?; February 7, 2010 at 11:38 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: I don't think Kate has any relationship with her kids. The way the kids interact with Kate seems awkward as if they're afraid of her.

In the Back to School episode. Kate said she went up to Mady and Cara rooms for the 1st time in months... And was shocked at how messy their room was.

Can you saw wow? What did Jon do when he was there for Mady and Cara's bday? He tucked them in at night and gave them all a hug.

Mady even cried cause she wanted Jon to stay.; February 7, 2010 at 11:45 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: Maybe one whose ex-husband had custody of the children so she did not have the option to be with them?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That's very possible.

Just as it's possible that when Jon is in New York, or anywhere else, he does not have the option to be with the kids because it's not his custody. But the press and everyone else is quick to report how Jon is no longer there for his kids...sigh, what an awful dad he is and it's played to the hilt. Why aren't they saying that about Kate? Double standard, no? The smear campaign is getting quite old and the article in Life and Style is just one example.; February 7, 2010 at 12:04 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Jon Gosselin Too Broke to Fight TLC
Posted Feb 7th 2010 1:50AM by TMZ Staff

Jon Gosselin doesn't have enough dough to fight TLC over the breach of contract lawsuit the network filed against him ... sources close to the case tell TMZ.

Our sources say Jon is now looking for a way to settle the suit due to his lack of funds to fight it -- especially after TLC won an injunction prohibiting Jon from violating the non-compete clause in his contract ... which means he can't make money by appearing on other shows.

We're told the only way the network will agree to settle is if Gosselin agrees to abide by the terms of his contract -- no exceptions.

We've yet to hear back from Jon's people.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If this is true, I believe if I was Jon I'd suck it up agree to abide by the contact AS LONG AS TLC agrees to NOT put the kids on camera, follow them around with a mic, mention them in any way. Then wait it out until the contract is up. Whatever he has to do to keep the kids out of the limelight.

Does anyone know just exactly what TLC means by "abide by terms, no exceptions"?; February 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Does anyone know just exactly what TLC means by "abide by terms, no exceptions"?

--------

It means Jon must keep his mouth shut and now write a tell all book or do a "Tell All" Documentary exposing the fraud of Kate and TLC.

Remember that "secret" contract Jon and Kate signed between the two?

TLC and Kate wants that hidden. If Jon exposes it, Kate's "reality" TV career is OVER. Not that she has any left.

---------
ALSO....

When does Jon's contract with TLC expire? If I were Jon, I would wait it out and wait for the contract to EXPIRE.

So what if TLC wins the lawsuit? Just file bankruptcy.

DON'T deal with the DEVIL. Jon should continue to fight and do not sell out his kids or himself to TLC.

------------

I still don't believe the story to be true.; February 7, 2010 at 1:02 PM
Lauren said... [Reply]: The straight jacket picture is hilarious. Ted doesn't look very happy escorting Kate to dinner and the ping pong place.; February 7, 2010 at 1:37 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: so...it means Jon would be forever muzzled about anything to do with TLC? Yes, I would hate to see that happen.

If he can file bankruptcy to keep from getting buried under the debt that would definitely be a better option. I, too, would hate to see him have to concede but TLC is really backing him into a corner. Obviously that is their intent. I have real doubts about Heller being the right lawyer to advise him in all this, but what can he afford otherwise?

Contract expiration date? I keep hearing something about April but I don't know really.; February 7, 2010 at 2:07 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/2425988/kate-gosselin-ted-gibson-new-hairdo-15/

"Kate Gosselin is a Manhattan Mama"

more pics of Kate on the town. You'll notice even the dog is wearing a coat! Nah...it's not cold.; February 7, 2010 at 3:03 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: You can tell Kate is FREEZING in this photo.

http://cdn.buzznet.com/media/jj1//2010/02/gosselin-manhattan/kate-gosselin-ted-gibson-new-hairdo-12.jpg

What a tool. Was it worth it Kate?; February 7, 2010 at 3:10 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...

Wow, the View MUST be desperate for cheap ratings for allow Kate to host again. WTF are they thinking?
---------

I don't know, but it would be nice if they would deem her too controversial.

If her association with The View were to coincide with something unpleasant for them, for example if people suddenly stopped picking apart Kate and started picking apart The View, then they would ditch her.; February 7, 2010 at 9:59 PM
Anonymous said... [Reply]: it seems as if TLC is releasing the news of jon "settling" with TLC to allow the kids to film to test the waters.

just to see how the public would react if TLC resumed filming the kids.

my message to tlc is to leave the kids alone and let them be kids.; February 8, 2010 at 1:10 AM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: Sorry if this has already been mentioned but, if I'm not mistaken, the Gosselin's website was still up just a couple of days ago, and it isn't now.; February 8, 2010 at 3:02 AM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: Anonymous said...

"it seems as if TLC is releasing the news of jon "settling" with TLC to allow the kids to film to test the waters....just to see how the public would react if TLC resumed filming the kids."

Rational people would be appalled. What would TLC and Kate do for such an encore -- film the kids' sessions with therapists?!

"my message to tlc is to leave the kids alone and let them be kids."

Don't take this the wrong way, but TLC is not going to get that message here.; February 8, 2010 at 3:17 AM
BeachMom said... [Reply]: Anonymous said...

Maybe whose ex-husband had custody of the children so she did not have the option to be with them?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

We had blizzard conditions here in the tri-state area. Many were without power for hours due to downed trees from the heavy snow. I would not have left my kids for the night so that I could have dinner in NYC with my hairstylist whether my ex-husband was visiting the kids or not...but like I wrote, that’s just my opinion.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

I had heard that Jon’s contract expired in April, so I can’t believe he would settle now when he’s in the home stretch. Also, let’s remember he has been at the Sundance Film Festival and snowboarding so how broke can he be? It would seem logical that he received money from the sale of the old house and savings/property in the divorce which I am sure would tide him over for a bit.; February 8, 2010 at 4:43 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: sixgosselins.com? It has been down for a while. Right after the divorce was final I believe.

And yes, TLC needs to leave the kids and Jon alone.; February 8, 2010 at 10:36 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: OK, I am pissed. An update on Kaydar states that Jon has allowed the kids to continue filming.
WTF is going on...; February 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM
HI 50 said... [Reply]: HUGE disappointment if Jon caved to TLC's demand to film the kids again. Hope he's been reading the blogs, there have been a lot of suggestions on how he could handle this TLC fiasco.

I'm SURE he is under tremendous pressure by TLC, BUT what are his options?!? No $$ to fight the giant corporation. TLC has been banned in our household. When a corporation knowingly, with help from an egotistical spouse, destroys a family OR allows a destruction of a family system, then their F---ed UP!!

KHATE is in bed with TLC, clear & system. The 8 little Gosselin lives have been destroyed & THEY DON'T give a s**t!!

Jon, abide by the contract until it expires then BUCK-A-LOOSE with a tell-all book!!

Are there ANY legal eagle team willing to take on his cause?! Just wondering...; February 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Of course it looks like it everything that happened was setup to put the pressure on Jon to give in. But he could have waited til April or so when his contract with the devil expired.

By "pressure, I mean...

1) The 5 figure monthly Child support payment. (Rumors has it that Kate would drop the Child Support of Jon gives in).

2) TLC banning Jon from making $$$ off the media.

3) Who knows what else.

But if true, it's sad to see how he couldn't wait 2 more months.; February 8, 2010 at 11:04 AM
HI 50 said... [Reply]: JJ, did you see the latest pics from http://blogs.babble.com/famecrawler/2009/12/07/kate-gosselins-kids-in-the-snow-photos/

Don't cha love the double standard, sneaky, smear campaign?

While Khate is clubbing in New York, during a blizzard, the skanky nanny is a home taking care of the Gosselin 8. What a B*@tch!!; February 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: "But a settlement does not mean that Jon & Kate Plus 8 will return to the air."

"Jon has offered to allow TLC to start filming his children again, but the network doesn’t trust him."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is it this part of the ROL story you're talking about?

I still say words can be twisted to mean what TLC wants it to mean. Also like you said, IF Jon offered, for whatever reason, and TLC settles, for whatever reason and whether they film the kids again or not, TLC will forever look like the bully in all of this for the way they've handled the situation. I think the thing to do is we continue to pressure TLC however and whenever possible. Sometimes you loose the battle but can win the war.; February 8, 2010 at 11:29 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: HI 50-
I think that's a December article. But it sure looks like Santoro in the pic.; February 8, 2010 at 11:31 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Yes, if true, it proves TLC only went after Jon because of the kids.

If TLC does "accept" Jon should right now way, JK. And laugh.

That would make TLC look really foolish. And proves that TLC is only after the kids. They can give a flip about Kate and Jon.

-----

BTW, I don't think that is Skanktoro in that December pic.; February 8, 2010 at 11:39 AM
SG said... [Reply]: Is the sosugary website no longer posting Gosselin pics?; February 8, 2010 at 11:40 AM
HI 50 said... [Reply]: JJ, noted a date from the pics...it was back in 2009. But the premise is the same, "...Kate is in NY clubbing during a winter blizzard..." & she's doing it ALL for HER kids! What a tragedy!; February 8, 2010 at 11:40 AM
SG said... [Reply]: It's not Santoro. They look VERY similar but it's not her.; February 8, 2010 at 11:41 AM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: SchmeckyGirl said...

It's not Santoro. They look VERY similar but it's not her.

----

Is it the girl in ur profile pic? LOL JK.; February 8, 2010 at 11:43 AM
IATK said... [Reply]: Do you think the corn shucking picture taken last summer is Santoro?; February 8, 2010 at 11:54 AM
SG said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers, Yes you caught me! I'm the not-a-nanny! ;)

I do not think Santoro was the corn husking nanny. The one in the pic with the kids in the snow is though.

Santoro's eyes are totally different.

Yes, they both had the same hairband on their wrists in the photo but it could be because it was one of the kids' hairbands. Most girls wear hairbands on their wrists for when they need them. I do too.

I will say that it is bizarre that they seem to be wearing the same purple shirt in pics though. I wonder if they are sisters??? They do look a lot alike. I wonder what her name is and why hasn't anyone found out who she is?; February 8, 2010 at 12:06 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: SG, you think the nanny playing with the kids in the snow under the arbor is Santoro?; February 8, 2010 at 12:10 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I think I'm getting confused...lol; February 8, 2010 at 12:11 PM
SG said... [Reply]: I found out something about the company that Kate got her nannies from:

Besides relationships with Dr. Phil, Supernanny and the Discovery Channel/TLC to name a few we have also teamed up with corporations to help find childcare for their employees. Thousands of families and nannies throughout the United States and Canada have joined Nannies4hire.com and our list continues to grow daily.

So TLC does seem to hire the nannies for Kate.; February 8, 2010 at 12:12 PM
HI 50 said... [Reply]: JJ, noticed the hyenas & jackals were in full force over at ROL defending Cruella Kate. TLC is definitely her master. When TLC commands her to jump, her response is, "Yes Master, how high." When TLC senses she might 'misbehave," they insure her compliance by throwing her a bone, "Steve." They feed her ego with 'beauty treatments' and insure she is rested for appearances by funding her household staff & hired help.

No friends or family allowed, they might outshine Cruella, & she will NOT be happy.

Can't wait for the tell-all books to start rolling out from Jon, Mady, Cara...or anyone of the brave little tups (when they become adults). Karma will definitely look interesting in the future.; February 8, 2010 at 12:24 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: This comment has been removed by the author.; February 8, 2010 at 12:26 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: HI 50 said...

Can't wait for the tell-all books to start rolling out from Jon, Mady, Cara...or anyone of the brave little tups (when they become adults). Karma will definitely look interesting in the future.

---

If Jon accepts TLC's new "terms/conditions" I doubt Jon would be able to write or produce a tell all documentary.

Mady & Cara maybe be able to when their 18, but that a long way from now.

Those people on kaydar are just out there. LOL

They obviously support Kate over the kids.

Over here, its the kids 1st, 2nd, 3rd, all the way thru 8... Then its Jon. (he seems to have a better relation with the kids).

Over there at Kaydar, its, Kate 1st, TLC 2nd, then the kids.

I get it, "it's not their kids being exploited" so who cares. As long as Kate is happy right?; February 8, 2010 at 12:30 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: SG, wasn't their at least one episode of Kate looking for a nanny? The one where she went to the nanny for hire place to do some interviewing? I have no doubt that every bit of Kate's life is intertwined with TLC and their "properties". TLC OWNS Kate. That was Jon's objection and why he's trying to break free. It' all really so sad. IMO, people who stick up for Kate and her rights to be who she is are just giving TLC permission to take over her life and the lives of the children.

There are none so blind as those who cannot see...

somebody said that. lol; February 8, 2010 at 12:41 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: If Jon accepts TLC's new "terms/conditions" I doubt Jon would be able to write or produce a tell all documentary.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

But would others outside TLC be able to tell the story based on their research of what's happened? Unauthorized story or something like that? It's not like there isn't tons of information and documentation. Someone just needs to piece it all together. They will be the ones with the big bucks in the end.; February 8, 2010 at 12:44 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Someone can, but it wouldn't be as believable or as shocking if it were written by Jon or written with Jon's authorization and help.

Wasn't there a rumor going around that Kate was going to promote her "tell-all" book in March when she c-hosts the View?

Maybe Kate and TLC wanted to jump in that boat before Jon did.

I do hope that Jon doesn't re-sign with the devil.; February 8, 2010 at 12:48 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Yes, I heard the rumor. I have no doublt TLC will ghost write a book for Kate telling their twisted version of it all. They about have to to save their a**. I've often wondered what the other TLC "families", LPBW, Table for 12, Duggars, etc., feel about this battle. Do you think it's opened their eyes at all? Not that they could or would do anything but I would think it might make them nervous to see what TLC can do to a family if you cross their path.

I, too hope Jon can stand his ground and do what's right, whatever that is.; February 8, 2010 at 1:01 PM
just wondering said... [Reply]: Actually, Jon would do better to write his book after Kate's. He could refute everything Kate had written and more. I would be a very happy camper if he would align himself with David Zurawik for that book. It would be huge.; February 8, 2010 at 1:01 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I think so too, JW. Z is probably one of the few writers that would keep it fair and balanced.; February 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM
just wondering said... [Reply]: Just for the record.. I'm not a Jon fan by any means. I think he is a weak and spineless little man who could have stopped after season 4 but who didn't want to give up the perks. But I think Kate is actually dangerous and consumed with dreams of fame and I abhor narcissistic personality.; February 8, 2010 at 1:05 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Yes, but Jon is the lesser of the two evil.

I do believe that Jon does genuinely love his kids. And the kids do love him.

But yes, some of the crap Jon has been pulling just doesn't look too good.

Unlike the sheeple who belives that Kate does no wrong and is perfect in every way.

I agree that Jon isn't perfect and has made several mistakes. And has continued to make them.

Repeating the sames mistakes make you a FN moron.; February 8, 2010 at 1:08 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I know, I've read your posts in other places. :)

I'm interested in the children, in finding the truth, and hopefully in some new child protection legislation coming from all this.; February 8, 2010 at 1:10 PM
SG said... [Reply]: itsaboutthekids,

Sorry if I mis"spoke". I do not think the corn husking pics are Santoro. I do not think the snow pics are Santoro either.; February 8, 2010 at 1:12 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Boy, those two nannies do look alike. It would be interesting to know who she is. Just coincidence you think?; February 8, 2010 at 1:19 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: Brad and Angeline to SUE a tabloid for fabricating stories about their split. Source

Why can't Jon do the same? Sue Radar, Life & Style, Skanktoro, Kate Major, Lohan, etc etc for Slander and Defamation.

Isn't recording a phone convo w/o the consent of the other party illegal? Jon should sue Lohan for that.; February 8, 2010 at 1:20 PM
just wondering said... [Reply]: "Why can't Jon do the same? Sue Radar, Life & Style, Skanktoro, Kate Major, Lohan, etc etc for Slander and Defamation."
_________

Because Heller prefers the "Court of Public Opinion!"

Sorry.. Couldn't resist.

Jon has crappy legal representation and has from the beginning. He couldn't wrangle his way out of a traffic ticket with this idiot.; February 8, 2010 at 1:34 PM
SG said... [Reply]: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20342494,00.html

Kate has a new book being released!; February 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM
just wondering said... [Reply]: So let me get this straight. She is selling letters to her children? BWAAaaaaaa!; February 8, 2010 at 1:42 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Kate:
"I want them to know without a shadow of a doubt how much I love them and how much every sacrifice made was worth it for them."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's always all about Kate.

In her own words, she considers her children one big sacrific.

Funny I consider my children a blessing. She just made me puke!!; February 8, 2010 at 1:48 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: LOL at Kate's new book.

There's a better way of letting your kids know how much you love them.

And the 8 individual letters addressed to the kids would be more meaningful if it were for their eyes only. Not the whole world.

Again, it's all about Kate even though she says it's for the kids.

At least this time, this book isn't a photo-album of the kids.

And Kate never wrote a best seller. Beth did.

Eight Little faces was a flop.; February 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM
Paula Caldarella said... [Reply]: OMG, I can't stop laughing. Other than the sheeple would be interested in this book? Who is the publisher?; February 8, 2010 at 2:14 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: Kate said:

"Each day the thought crosses my mind that when they get older, my kids are going to look back and think about how they were raised," Gosselin says in a statement. "I know they will have a lot of questions about things that may not make sense because they were raised so unconventionally. I don’t want them to grow up and wonder; I want them to know without a shadow of a doubt how much I love them and how much every sacrifice made was worth it for them."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There's just so much wrong with this statement. "raised so unconventionally"? I thought they were just going about their normal everyday activities and just happened to be filmed at the time??

I could have writted a better release and I'm lousy.

LIES, LIES, LIES, LIES; February 8, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Paula Caldarella said... [Reply]: Um, exactly what sacrifice did Kate make? Do you think she will address that in the book? I know it must have been a sacrifice to turn down that tummy tuck and the free vacations and the spa trips and the hair extensions and the book tour that took her away for weeks at a time. Please - this woman is a whack job from the get go.; February 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: I especially like the word "writted". See, I told you I'm lousy. LMAO!; February 8, 2010 at 2:33 PM
IATK said... [Reply]: She laid on bed rest for 30 weeks and let people wait on her. hmmm She did all those things that moms all over the world do for their children and happily so. Most people consider their kids a joy. She considers them a chore. I saw more smiles on her face while in New York for one night than I've seen for the last month around her kids. Sad, sad, sad..; February 8, 2010 at 2:36 PM
Not Anonymous said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...

Those people on kaydar are just out there. LOL

They obviously support Kate over the kids.

Over here, its the kids 1st, 2nd, 3rd, all the way thru 8... Then its Jon. (he seems to have a better relation with the kids).

---

Thanks for giving me a great laugh. There is nothing about this site that is any way, shape or form supportive of the kids. The purpose of this blog is to bash Kate. Why don't you simply own up to that?; February 8, 2010 at 3:22 PM
Not Anonymous said... [Reply]: jibberjabbers said...

LOL at Kate's new book.

There's a better way of letting your kids know how much you love them.

And the 8 individual letters addressed to the kids would be more meaningful if it were for their eyes only. Not the whole world.

---

I think this is the first time I've agreed with something you've written. The purpose of the book is to make money, plain and simple.; February 8, 2010 at 3:33 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: What are you talking about? I just bashed Jon several times today.; February 8, 2010 at 3:38 PM
Not Anonymous said... [Reply]: Perhaps I don't read every word that you write. Hard for you to believe, I know...; February 8, 2010 at 3:50 PM
HI 50 said... [Reply]: WTF!!

Book 1, JON & Kate Gosselin and BETH CARSON.

Book 2, NO literary accomplishment. A digital scrapbook for fans of the Gosselin 8.

Book 3, "Love is in the Mix..." Postponed because she plagirized recipes.

Book 3, a book dedicated to the Gosselin 8.

These books were sacrifices on the backs of the Gosselin 8. Kate's BIGGEST accomplishment? Decide to have MORE children even when your husband was against it AND you can't afford to feed them. Lie to the fertility doctor, have sex when you're told NOT TO, have the taxpayers of PA pay for your STUPIDITY pre & post natal. Capitalize on the kids & throw your husband under the bus to be run over by her love & master, TLC.

Why should ANYONE believe anything she says when she LIES about everything. She lied about their renewal ceremony because she's a contract honorer. Right! She LIED about her relationship with Jon then spun her 'victimish' (Kate's language) boo-hoo stories!

She's a black widow, spinning a HUGE web of lies about love, faith & family? Unbelievable! She has the WORST relationship with her church & family?! What an egomanical LIAR!

Pity the children!; February 8, 2010 at 5:15 PM
HI 50 said... [Reply]: Mommy Dearest at her best. I give her this much, she's convinced her followers that she is a victimish martyr. Hummm, didn't she bash Jon for being a "victim" because she slapped his face in one of their episodes from Season 4?

Check out Christina Crawford's book about her mom on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mommie_Dearest

Think I'll get psychic & predict one of the Gosselin kids (OR more) will someday do their own tell-all book. Don't be surprised when its revealed that Kate is a closet drinker (humm, great box of wine) who rages on the kids when the spotlight grows dim & her 15 minutes disappears.; February 8, 2010 at 5:24 PM
jibberjabbers said... [Reply]: I feel bad for Kate. She has to sacrifice so much. We don't even know how it feels to have full-time nannies care for her 8 kids.

We don't know how it feels to get freebies and gifts. Vacations and all.

We dont' know how it feels to have a personal chef to cook for us on call.

Kate, I feel bad for you. I hope things get better for you.; February 8, 2010 at 5:28 PM
OrderlyL said... [Reply]: This comment has been removed by the author.; February 9, 2010 at 4:52 AM
just wondering said... [Reply]: http://www.grimmy.com/comics.php

***********
Very funny little comic about the G's.; February 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM