Shop at EatLovePray
Custom t-shirts, Phone Cases, Clocks, Business Cards and more!

About Us...

Exposing the lies and seeking truth doesn't = Hate. This is not a Kate Hate Site. A 'Kate Hate Site" wouldn't have "Shame on Kate AND Shame on Jon" in the reaction box.

Just a place where bloggers and commenters can share an open discussion on all things related to the Gosselins.

This blog was created to expose the spins and lies shared by the media and by several individuals who continue to spread filth and garbage for their own self-interests.

This blog will expose those who continue to spread lies as "truth" and those who base their beliefs and support for one individual based on those lies.
Pursuing Truth, Exposing Lies and Informing the Sheeple

April 21, 2010

Who returned the dogs back to the breeder?

BUMP! For those idiots still blaming Jon for taking the dogs away. And didn't Kate say the dogs were returning? What happened? Or is she waiting til Twisted Kate begins?

Kate once again tried to put the blame on Jon in People Magazine. But here we have a video of Kate saying that she didn't have any time for the dogs and that maybe one day the dogs will return.

Kate of course DEMANDED that Jon be the one to be there when the dogs were taken away. But it was KATE who didn't want the dogs. As proven in this video. Kate even joked about making the dogs pull the kids on a sled during the winter and even laughed about how the dogs were locked up in cages for so long that the dogs manage do BEND THE BARS to break out.

Once again, Kate EXPOSED in her own lies. This bitch lies so many times that she can't keep track of it.

Related Posts...



57 comments:

BeachMom said... [Reply]

I wonder how long those dogs were in the crates for them to have enough time to bend the bars?

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Why are the dogs returning? Publicity stunt? She claims in this video that she didn't have time to care for the dogs. Even though the show was canceled and she wasn't doing anything with her life.

Now that she's doing DWTS, training for months on end, how will she manage to care for these dogs?

Oh that's right. Kate has FIVE NANNIES at the McMansion.

Kate isn't a mother. How can you idiots even relate to this woman? Do you have nannies caring for your kids? How can you sympathize with this poor excuse for a human being?

Anonymous said... [Reply]

Jibberjabbers, you're the best! You back up everything you say with the hard evidence. I only wish a legitimate, respected mainstream reporter would do the same.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

^ Thank you for noticing. At least someone gets it.

Kippie said... [Reply]

How can she do this? Dogs aren't a pair of shoes that you switch for good weather?

Those poor kids. Does anything last forever?

Julie said... [Reply]

I hope the dogs received traing while back at the breeders. Maybe that is why they are bringing them back.

If Kate didn't have time to take care of them at least she sent them somewhere they would.

Maybe she realized it was the wrong thing to send them away. People can and do realize they have made mistakes in the past.

I don't think it matters who sent them away. When Jon moved out of the house maybe he should have chosen a place that he could have taken the dogs with him. That would have been an option.

OrderlyL said... [Reply]

If Kate had choose a dog, she would choose an ankle-biter or one of the dumber, cute breeds like a Cocker Spaniel (one of my own dogs is a dumb-ish, cute, mixed-breed rescue so, no offense to Cocker Spaniel owners, unless your choice to acquire it was a selfish one). The German Shepherd Dogs are smarter than Kate.

Dunwoody Mom said... [Reply]

Ah, yes, Julie, it always comes back to be Jon's fault, eh? Kate did not want or take care of the dogs and she has the McMansion, but, well, it's Jon's fault.

Geez, you people are a sad bunch.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Julie, Julie, Julie. Did you watch the video & hear Kate's excuse for sending the dogs away?!! What part didn't you understand?

Here's a timeline of events:

1. Jon & Kate agree to GIVE the kids puppies for THE KIDS CHRISTMAS GIFT!!!! Remember this!!
2. The Gosselins goes to the breeder to choose the puppies.
3. The puppies are the kids gift BUT Kate jumps in to choose the 1st puppy. The kids fight over the 2nd puppy. Of course the spotlight is on Kate and the puppy of HER choice. Meanwhile, the kids are fighting and crying.
4. Kate names BOTH puppies. The kids have NO CHOICE. But the puppies are the KIDS Christmas gift.
5. The puppies go home. Kate FREAKS out because the puppy pees on the floor. Kate shreiks, scaring more pee out of the puppies.
6. J&K go through a messy, public separation & divorce.
7. KATE decides to send the puppies away! She 'doesn't have time to take care of them.' Ha, ha, ha! She's so funny. She had a full staff of nannies, a chef, a gardner. Time for spa treatments, mani/pedicures, tanning sessions BUT no time for the puppies.
8. She wanted Jon to do the dirty deed.
9. DWTS, media blitz, travel, hair extentions, negative press.
10. Damage control / image repair...quick, bring the puppies back! When DWTS practice/travel is finish, oops I mean, the weather is warmer.

Mistake? Probably NOT. Kate is a shrewd woman, everything she does is calculated. IF she really wanted to make amends, the dogs would be home NOW. After all Nala & Shoka were the KIDS CHRISTMAS GIFT. Her PR team is madly scrambling to repair her image. It's all business, it NOT about the kids.

AND it does matter who sent them away. Jon was bashed about the dogs BUT it was KATE's decision to send them away. Don't blame Jon. REMEMBER, the dogs were the kids CHRISTMAS GIFT therefore, the dogs should have stayed on the property, with the kids.

Jon moved out because they were living a LIE imposed on Jon by Kate & TLC. Stop making excuses for Kate's decisions and behaviors. Intelligent people see through her LIES.

OrderlyL said... [Reply]

^ Add:
But German Shepherd Dogs were not the best breed for the Gosselin family, either. GSDs are good family dogs, but they were bred to work. They have a tendency to become destructive if they don't get enough exercise and mentally challenging activity. Ideally, they should be in agility or have some kind of regular "job". They need leadership, too. I can't imagine what kind of breeder would have sent a GSD puppy home with Jon and Kate, much less two puppies, with owners who don't have experience in handling the breed.

However, it does say something for the breeder if they accepted the dogs back when it didn't work out. Hate to say it but, in that situation, the best thing was for the breeder to take the dogs back, and for the Gosselins to not get any more dogs until they were willing and able to care for them properly.

OrderlyL said... [Reply]

Julie said...

I hope the dogs received traing while back at the breeders. Maybe that is

----------

Another fake ID, Pattypie, you bitch?

Julie said... [Reply]

Orderly L

I am not Patty Pie.

My name is Julie.

JJ I posted my opinion per your rules

Please refrain from personal attacks aimed at other posters/commenters. We all have our own opinions and you are free to express them here, but keep it civilized as it creates are more friendly environment.

I was civil. I think Orderly L is out of line by calling me a bitch.

Julie said... [Reply]

I never said it was Jon's fault. I said he also had a choice to move somewhere he could care for the dogs but chose not to.

Ava's Mommy said... [Reply]

Jibber:

Long time lurker. I don't post that much anymore about the gosselins. But since I read this about the dogs with your investigations on this Fam. I was wondering have you ever thought of putting a whole segment of Kate and her BS?
( this might open up the eyes of others)

Since the first ever taping of the gosselins. When they went to the Martha Stewart show. Kate wanted to take the makeup artist home with her. Kate never practice organic produce/food until later on. Kate season one looked for a nanny. Kate season one looked for a housekeeper. Kate has always had some kind of help with the children. She has never been one/one with them. Fighting for PA nursing help ( anyone).. Asking Dr Glassman for the breast. Since he was giving her a "Free tummy tuck" she would have to pay for the boobs. Kate must of declined. No boobs.

I just thought to bring this up. I know you can do this jibber. Best of luck all.

ps. the dog issue. Oh it must be spring time. I guess the dogs go to boarding school. Must be time to come back. Since Kate will be gone dwts/and dwts crap, book tour, than tlc show who knows. You know she will not spend the money to take the kids on vacation. Unless someone wants to chip in the the free va-cay for the hardest working mother alive LOL..

itsaboutthekids said... [Reply]

Julie said...
I never said it was Jon's fault. I said he also had a choice to move somewhere he could care for the dogs but chose not to.
~~~~~~~~~~

Yes, Jon had that choice, but it's a choice that makes no sense. The dogs belonged to the kids so it only made sense for the dogs to live WITH the kids. There was plenty of room there for all of them. Unfortunately for the kids, Kate didn't want the dogs at the house and to be bothered with them.

If you find the comments here so full of hate why do you hang around and torture yourself? Just curious...

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Jon moving closer to keep the dogs is NOT the solution. The dogs were a CHRISTMAS GIFT from J&K to the kids. Why would Jon need to relocate the dogs to satisfy Kate? The property is approximately 22 acres, MORE than enough room for the family & the dogs.

Kate has a full time staff, WHY doesn't she have time to take care of the dogs? US mag recently posted a sample of her schedule. There was barely enough time for the kids because she's too busy taking care of number 1 = Kate. Pre-DWTS, mani/pedicures, spa treatments, tanning, shopping...yeah, I can see now why she had no time for the dogs.

BTW, she did give up on the dogs. Humm, kind of like how she's giving up on the kids' childhood to pursue her obsession with fame.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

1st of all the dogs were Christmas gifts to the 8 children.

2nd, the McMansion already has a huge backyard and all the room in the world to house the dogs.

3rd, Kate claims "surprisingly the kids weren't SAD at all when the dogs went away.

So why are they coming back?

Kate has at least 2 full-time nannies. They could have been there to care for the dogs.

Maybe the fact that Jon has allow TLC to film the kids, is the real reason the dogs are back. To film her new show and it wouldn't be right w/o the dogs.

Julie said... [Reply]

itsaboutthekids
If you find the comments here so full of hate why do you hang around and torture yourself? Just curious...

*******************************
Trust me there is nothing anyone on here could say that would torture me.

I'm just asking that orderlyl abide by the rules.

I never said the comments were hateful.

I just don't appreciate being called a bitch.

I wonder why you and orderlyl and JJ seem to thinks it ok to call someone a BITCH for stating an opinion different to yours.

itsaboutthekids said... [Reply]

Julie said...

Trust me there is nothing anyone on here could say that would torture me.

I'm just asking that orderlyl abide by the rules.

I never said the comments were hateful.

I just don't appreciate being called a bitch.

I wonder why you and orderlyl and JJ seem to thinks it ok to call someone a BITCH for stating an opinion different to yours.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Does this post look familiar from Baby Mama's site?

Julie said...

I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoy reading your blog. It's refreshing to read comments about the Gosselins that aren't full of hate.

March 13, 2010 3:52 AM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There's more but this is the only part that applies to our discussion. I assumed since you are posting at what you call "hate sites" that you were talking about the posts on those sites.

Did I call you a bitch? It's a word I seldom use, but on occasion when I refer to Kate I find it fitting. Please point out to me where I called you this and I'll apologize if you're offended.

As I said before, I think you're here just to stir the pot because you've said very little in true defense of Kate and her actions. You've offered only vague possibilities and lame excuses for her. At least that's IMO.

Julie said... [Reply]

Yes I made that comment over there.

Now you're bringing comments from another blog.

I wonder what your motivation is for posting at Sage's blog. Are you just over there stirring up trouble?

Frankly I have never seen you post anything that's true, but that's just my opinion.

I didn't know this was your blog. JJ has never objected to my posting before and I've been posting here way longer than you have.

I have been posting here when there was just me and one other poster.

At least I don't from site to site and spew hatred toward the parents of children I am proclaiming to be so concerned for. Yeah...that's real helpful.

itsaboutthekids said... [Reply]

Julie said...
Yes I made that comment over there.

Now you're bringing comments from another blog.

I wonder what your motivation is for posting at Sage's blog. Are you just over there stirring up trouble?

Frankly I have never seen you post anything that's true, but that's just my opinion.

I didn't know this was your blog. JJ has never objected to my posting before and I've been posting here way longer than you have.

I have been posting here when there was just me and one other poster.

At least I don't from site to site and spew hatred toward the parents of children I am proclaiming to be so concerned for. Yeah...that's real helpful.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Julie, the remark you made here, "I never said the comments were hateful" is a direct contradiction to what you said at Babymama's site, "It's refreshing to read comments about the Gosselins that aren't full of hate."

How could I make the comparison without copying your comment? You said a lot more at the other site but I only copied a portion of the quote that applied. What's your point?

SchmeckyGirl and I were, I believe, a couple of the initial posters at Sage's site. It was promoted as an open site where anyone could post so my motivation was to try and have discussions about the Gosselins. I posted there a couple of different times but you're right, it only stirred the pot because no one cared to really discuss anything, to deconstruct what had happend with this family. And unless you're pro-Kate and contend she does no wrong, I found it basically pointless to try and have a conversation there. So I quit commenting several weeks ago. Nothing personal, I just found it a waste of my time.

Your opinion of my posts is just that, your opinion and that's fine. I'm not trying to change your opinion. I just wondered why you post on what you call a hate site but I sure don't care if you do. I don't think you're going to change any minds here but JJ has certainly left the door open for you to try. I think this is a great site to go to for factual information. JJ finds solid written or pictorial proof of how Kate's lies are delivered as truth.

The spewing hatred claim is old and tired to me, but it's just your opinion and not necessarily true so believe what you want. One of the reasons I quit posting at pro-Kate sites. Too many blinders IMO.

BTW, you forgot to show me where I called you a bitch. Just want to make sure I don't owe you an apology.

Julie said... [Reply]

I give. If you think JJ's site is factual then you are hopeless.

You can't argue with crazy.

itsaboutthekids said... [Reply]

Julie said...
I give. If you think JJ's site is factual then you are hopeless.

You can't argue with crazy.
~~~~~~~~~~

In YOUR opinion. LOL

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Julie, please stop making me laugh so hard!!

Video, pictures, interviews from multiple sources. Factual evidence, sometimes used in a court of law.

A video of Kate commenting on the dogs & why SHE sent them away.

Pictures of her flat chested then inflated chest.

Interviews on TV, in magazines. Kate quote, "I have to do everything by myself for the kids....I would never hire a nanny..." But here she is now with not 1 but 5 nannies. She cooks 'mommy meals' but now its revealed she has a chef who preps the family meals.

You give? Really? If you don't believe this site is factual, why are you commenting. And why are still arguing with crazy? Ha, ha, ha, you're so comedic.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

When you can't defend your arguments with facts, data or any hardcore evidence, you do the next best thing. Name calling.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

HI 50 said...

Video, pictures, interviews from multiple sources. Factual evidence, sometimes used in a court of law.

A video of Kate commenting on the dogs & why SHE sent them away.

Pictures of her flat chested then inflated chest.

Interviews on TV, in magazines. Kate quote, "I have to do everything by myself for the kids....I would never hire a nanny..." But here she is now with not 1 but 5 nannies. She cooks 'mommy meals' but now its revealed she has a chef who preps the family meals.

---

You can't be serious. You think unnamed sources in tabloid magazines could be used as evidence in a court of law?

OrderlyL said... [Reply]
This comment has been removed by the author.
itsaboutthekids said... [Reply]

JJ, re: name calling. I agree. It's a childish response to a losing argument.

If a Kate defender would make a list of what's good about Kate, what good things she's done for her children, family, the public or needy at large, and PROVE with facts or evidence that it was a truly SELFLESS act, I might listen to their argument.

Therein lies the problem. They can't because she hasn't, won't and doesn't. I always wonder how they're going to defend Kate when she's at the bottom of the heap...and she WILL get there because she keeps opening her mouth. People are learning. People who didn't know much about her before, people with fresh eyes and ears unspoiled by the pro-Kate rhetoric are learning from Kate herself. Because she keeps opening her mouth and the lies keep rolling off her tongue.

OrderlyL said... [Reply]

^^
HI 50
Look out, that's our resident evil.

Regardless of what she says, there is nothing incorrect about the comment, "Video, pictures, interviews from multiple sources. Factual evidence, sometimes used in a court of law.", no reason you wouldn't have been serious. It shouldn't even be called into question, much less defended.

OrderlyL said... [Reply]

Julie said...

I wonder why you and orderlyl and JJ seem to thinks it ok to call someone a BITCH for stating an opinion different to yours.
-------------------

Sorry, I probably shouldn't have done that. You're probably sensitive about your illogic.

OrderlyL said... [Reply]

itsaboutthekids said...

If a Kate defender would make a list of what's good about Kate, what good things she's done for her children, family, the public or needy at large, and PROVE with facts or evidence that it was a truly SELFLESS act, I might listen to their argument.
--------------

Ditto, if they were to ever write a fair and balanced post Everyone has weaknesses and strengths. I'm making a mental note to, next time the lovers give the excuse that Kate's not perfect, ask them why they never have anything negative to say about Kate.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

OrderlyL said...

^^
HI 50
Look out, that's our resident evil.

---

Hmmm...just the other day you were telling me to f*ck off and claiming not to read what I wrote (which I'm sure was a big fat lie) and now you're commenting on what I write? I love when you "warn" people about me. "Code red! Code red! Someone whose opinion differs from the pack has posted on our beloved blog." I guess for someone with your obvious anger management issues, this is tantamount to an emergency as it puts you over the edge.

Hi 50 stated that Kate has five nannies as an example of one those "facts" that might be used in a court of law. And where did that "fact" come from? An unnamed source in a rag magazine. Utterly ridiculous.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Hi OrderlyL, guess the resident evil just doesn't get it so he/she could take only ONE piece to jump all over...unnamed sources was NOT what I was referring to.

FYI Not Anonymous. I was referencing Kate's interviews. She talks with a forked tongue. First she says this but she really meant that...ha, ha, ha!!! I love her contradictions and comedic act! Wonder where her next show will be? Oh yeah, DWTS.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

^ No, you don't get it. You used the "five nannies" as an example of fact that contradicted Kate's interviews, when it is not fact, but gossip, and certainly not an example of something that could be admitted into evidence in a court of law.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Oh, that was your reference. The 5 nannies. Let's see unless she's fired the previous nannies, the pictures don't lie. Let's use the pictures as evidence. I count at least 5 or 6 different nannies. AND Kate stated, in interviews, she can't handle the kids by herself SO logic would be simple. Kate has nannies.

Let's not get too technical. My bad if I said she had 5 nannies. I'll just count the different nannies in pictures with the kids.

What about the other evidence? I see you're only referencing one statement? Humm, stop making me laugh, you're toooo funny.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

HI 50 said...

Let's not get too technical. My bad if I said she had 5 nannies. I'll just count the different nannies in pictures with the kids.

---
Do you think the "let's not get too technical" argument works in court also? You are making me laugh. Glad we are able to amuse one another.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

NA, good student grasshopper. Kate has been a good master for you little grasshopper. You dance around the question, just like your mentor, what about the other evidence.

Pay attention grasshopper. What about statements that fall out of Kate's forked tongued mouth in her interviews and videos? What about the pictures?

NA, good grasshopper. Thank you for my morning laughter. I really appreciate your dancing around the evidence & picking out one little piece, 5 nannies. Not to worry, Kate never fails her audience and you ave been a very good student.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

Ah, it seems that yet another poster here can't handle being called on their bullshit. Somehow, I'm not surprised.

Have fun obsessing over every move that Kate makes and every word that comes out of her mouth so that you can put together your "evidence." You and your buddies are doing a masterful job so far. That video of Jon's happy moments with his kids that JibberJabbers put together is every lawyer's wet dream. I bet it will be used if Jon ever decides to renegotiate his custody arrangement. /sarcasm

HI 50 said... [Reply]

NA. Are you looking in the mirror? You're too hilarious. Grasshopper, I see you follow in your master's footsteps. Deflect the attention away from the original argument. There we go again, its all Jon's fault. Do you see YOUR obsession with Jon?

Have you ever seen a dog chase its tail? Its so funny to watch because the dog obsessively chases its tail but the tail is always elusive. It is so rare when the dog is finally able to catch its tail.

Kate & all her followers "chase the dragon" like the dog chases its tail. Look it up grasshopper. Kate chases the dragon to fulfill her unquenchable thirst to be an idol. The more she gets the more she wants.

She confessed she has big plans. She offers her children up as sacrificial lambs to TLC and any network conglomerate with the highest $bid$. She is the epitome of child exploitation. She owns it.

In that quest, she leaves broken relationships with husband, family, friends, dogs. Anyone and anything that gets in her way, they're tossed in the garbage. Check!

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Kate 'kills its.' Ha, ha, ha. Kills what? Relationships? So the only relationships she now has are with obsessed fans, paid/hired help who are under the gun to perform at Kate's standards? If Kate doesn't get what Kate wants, OFF WITH THEIR HEADS! Ooooo, that sounds like the Queen from Alice in Wonderland. Queenie Kate, "Come & get your popcorn OR its off with your little heads!"

BTW JJ, thanks for letting me share my creative stories. It's been so much fun bantering with NA, Kate's little grasshopper.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Actually NA, the lawyers can just listens to the kids testimony or watch 1 episode of j&k plus 8.

Even have old neighbors or friends to testify as character witnesses.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

HI 50 said...

NA. Are you looking in the mirror? You're too hilarious. Grasshopper, I see you follow in your master's footsteps. Deflect the attention away from the original argument. There we go again, its all Jon's fault. Do you see YOUR obsession with Jon?

---

Uh, I said nothing negative about Jon nor did I say anything was Jon's fault Your obsession with hating Kate seems to have impacted your comprehension skills, assuming of course that you had any to begin with. I was making fun of your inability to differentiate between fact, gossip and opinion and used that silly video as an example. It has nothing to do with denigrating Jon and everything to do with laughing at the ludicrousness of your argument.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

HI 50 said...

Kate 'kills its.' Ha, ha, ha....
---
I have no clue WTF you are talking about. You sound completely nuts. Are you related to OrderlyL, perhaps? I almost hope you are the same person as it's sadder to think there are two of you out there.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

jibberjabbers said...

Actually NA, the lawyers can just listens to the kids testimony or watch 1 episode of j&k plus 8.

Even have old neighbors or friends to testify as character witnesses.

---

Actually,Jibberjabbers, you have no clue what the kids would say. Difficult as it may be for you to fathom, they might actually not hate their mother. I realize that doesn't fit your vile little fantasy, but since you don't actually KNOW these children you cannot assume to have any freakin' clue how they feel.

You also have no clue what friends would say, since once again you DO NOT KNOW THESE PEOPLE. Obsessing over every piece of gossip doesn't change that tiny fact.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Just look at how the kids lights up when they are with Jon compared to when they are with Kate.

Of course I don't know what the kids are going say, that's why the judge should ask them who they would rather be with.

I do know that Mady say, on camera that she "liked daddy better".

I also saw the reason of all the kids when Mady made that statement. None of them disagreed.

I also know that Kate has been seen, in public abusing her kids on several occasions. This was out in public. Imagine what this shrew does behind close doors.

Kate has anger issues. It's pretty evident.

Try looking at things w/o your head way up in Kate's behind. It'll open up a whole new world.

OrderlyL said... [Reply]

HI 50 said...

Hi OrderlyL, guess the resident evil just doesn't get it so he/she could take only ONE piece to jump all over...unnamed sources was NOT what I was referring to.
---------

In my experience, it's a mistake to consider discourse with her as worthwhile since she may well ignore your counterpoint. She may simply bring up other points. You'll debate at her whim, although she lies in wait to engage it. No good can come of it, hence evil. I'm not sure why she doesn't go to Sage's blog since there are lots of wannabe bad-asses over there. I guess she'd rather take bullets for Kate over here than battle their whims, over there...lazy.

Not Anonymous said... [Reply]

jibberjabbers said...
...
I do know that Mady say, on camera that she "liked daddy better".

I also saw the reason of all the kids when Mady made that statement. None of them disagreed.

I also know that Kate has been seen, in public abusing her kids on several occasions. This was out in public. Imagine what this shrew does behind close doors.

Kate has anger issues. It's pretty evident.

Try looking at things w/o your head way up in Kate's behind. It'll open up a whole new world.

---

Mady also said they did more fun things with Mom when she was mad at Jon. Does that mean she likes her mother better? Of course not, it means she likes to play one parent off the other. Many children do that.

I don't think Kate has been seen in public abusing her children. Your idea of what constitutes abuse and what actually is abuse are not one and the same. That's why your fantasy of the children being removed from the home has not become reality.

As for anger issues...I'd say there's some evidence out there that Jon has anger issues of his own. Kate isn't the only one to have snapped at the kids on camera. Perhaps it is your head that needs to be removed from someone's ass.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

NA, BM, ROL blogger, whoever you are, poor little grasshopper. Be careful, with your rage & obsession to be right. You're emulating your idol Kate, you're likely to burst an aneurysm in your tiny little brain. I'm so sorry, you're filled with hate & anger. I thought we were having a little banter to enlighten your little world.

"I said nothing negative about Jon nor did I say anything was Jon's fault"

Sure you did, your passive-aggression dig to deflect attention away from your idol.

"That video of Jon's happy moments with his kids that JibberJabbers put together is every lawyer's wet dream. I bet it will be used if Jon ever decides to renegotiate his custody arrangement. /sarcasm"

"I have no clue WTF you are talking about. You sound completely nuts."

Ok grasshopper, stop chasing your tail & pay attention. It appears it is inconceivable for you to understand the hidden meanings of metaphors & parables. So I stop, for now.

Sometimes I blog for entertainment or to sharpen my skills in creative writing. When you see "quotes" from your idol, just know these are words she actually states in HER interviews. FYI, the DWTS interview with poor Tony. His eyes appear to glaze over when she goes on & on, "I have to kill it..." She's on the entertainment channels so there is no avoiding her if I want to watch news about someone else. She's in the public, so I WILL comment as I see it.

Take care of your blood pressure, watch out for the aneurysm. Your rage can be lethal to your health.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

JJ, wasn't there a blog war between the Kate supporter blogs? Kate's little grasshopper came hopping on over here to protect her/his idol. I left for a few hours & had a lovely luncheon with family. I'm back to finish up some paperwork but wanted a little entertainment. I see little grasshopper is mad, enraged about comments I posted earlier. Don't cha love it!

Little grasshopper, please stop chasing your tail. I'm concerned about your behaviors. Maybe an interventionist needs to be called in to help in your obsession with all things Jon & Kate.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

I believe the blog war was between Mike or Matt Heckman and Musing From the Moon.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Wasn't there a blog war between BM & Sage? it was pretty wild!

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Not sure, I don't visit any of those blogs. haha It's like kaydar but w/o the substance.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Nice to see the sheeple finally shut up. Maybe they actually watched the video clip this time before they start to jibber jabber.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

jj, yup, you're right. Maybe NA took a smart pill then watched the video. I was having so much fun with Kate's little grasshopper.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Not Anonymous said...

Mady also said they did more fun things with Mom when she was mad at Jon. Does that mean she likes her mother better? Of course not, it means she likes to play one parent off the other. Many children do that.

---------

Exactly, "they do more fun things with mom"....

Not they have more fun with mom.

BIG DIFFERENCE THERE.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Oooooo, yeah the Mady comment. Mady is very interesting and you gotta love her honesty. She manipulates J&K. Mady is media savvy. Its unfortunate she was being mean & disrespectful to Jon on camera. Hummm, wonder where she learned that behavior.

As for "Mommy does more fun things..." Episodes showed Kate receives freebies to do 'things' with the kids FOR THE CAMERA. She missed the Statute of Liberty opportunity & cried about it on National TV. Remember that? Its all part of the storyline. Mommy Dearest is certainly demonstrating & modeling the how-tos of entitlement behaviors for the kids.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Remember, Mady is always the one hugging and talking to Jon. She never hugs Kate and rarely ever has a conversation with her.

When Kate announced that they were getting puppies for Christmas, Mady got up to hug Jon and not Kate. LOL

Just 1 example, you can find hundreds more if you watched the show.

Post a Comment

Please refrain from personal attacks aimed at other posters/commenters. We all have our own opinions and you are free to express them here, but keep it civilized as it creates are more friendly environment.

Not all comments will be approved.