Shop at EatLovePray
Custom t-shirts, Phone Cases, Clocks, Business Cards and more!

About Us...

Exposing the lies and seeking truth doesn't = Hate. This is not a Kate Hate Site. A 'Kate Hate Site" wouldn't have "Shame on Kate AND Shame on Jon" in the reaction box.

Just a place where bloggers and commenters can share an open discussion on all things related to the Gosselins.

This blog was created to expose the spins and lies shared by the media and by several individuals who continue to spread filth and garbage for their own self-interests.

This blog will expose those who continue to spread lies as "truth" and those who base their beliefs and support for one individual based on those lies.
Pursuing Truth, Exposing Lies and Informing the Sheeple

May 3, 2010

Does this picture look right to you? Hmmm

Did TLC do a background check on Mr. Neild before he was hired to protect Kate or watch the kids? I could have added a few sly remarks but the photo is disturbing as-is.


This doesn't look right either.

Related Posts...



34 comments:

TheresaB said... [Reply]

I remember this. NO, it is not right.
He is NOT HER FATHER.

No, this is wrong on SO MANY LEVELS.

Anonymous said... [Reply]

Sure looks like a bodyguard here. Not. Looks like he's on vacation?

TVSnark said... [Reply]

Bodyguard in sandles?

Team Kids said... [Reply]

Kate van got mad at me for posting this link on 15. Therefore, I'm posting it aabsolutely everywhere.

Vote for Jon.

http://www.usmagazine.com/momsbabies/news/should-jon-gosselin-accept-cash-from-kate-201035

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

What's the point of that poll? The only thing I think should happened is that Jon should pay Child Support based on his current income.. 22k is way over the top.

And I bet at least 60% of that aren't even going to the kids.

Can you say Spa treatments, tanning salons, etc etc.

JENSPAL said... [Reply]

I agree...20 grand a month in CS is rediculous and I'm betting most of that goes to pay the NANNIES to take care of the kids 24/7. Hmmm, maybe instead of paying the nannies, they reduce Jon's CS and allow him to take care of his own children while Kate does her thing. And seriously, what's with the body guard being around all the time? He looks uncomffy in this pic (arms folded and closed off). These kids will latch on to anyone, even if they barely know them...it's so obvious the kids are desperate for love and comfort that their mother isn't providing.

Anonymous said... [Reply]
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said... [Reply]

There are some sick, twisted souls posting here, starting with the blog owner. There is nothing sexual about this picture. If you think there is something wrong with this picture, that says a whole lot about you. Get the professional help you obviously need.

Sense said... [Reply]

bleech you are so sick. What is wrong with this picture? A kid showing affection. You must be an old dried up prune prude. Arent't you the one promoting the crotch shots of Kate? Pervert.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

All I asked was, "does this look right to you?"....

If you're offended by that simple question, then obviously you see something wrong with this picture.

I'll leave it at that.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

WHY are the kids bonding with PAID employees? Because Kate consciously choose to alienate blood relatives. The children have had very little contact with their maternal and paternal family members. Kate allows contact when family members "KNOW HOW TO HELP" Kate, on Kate's terms. If family don't agree with control freak Kate, its OFF WITH THEIR HEADS! NO contact with HER property, oops, children.

What wrong with the picture is a child seeking comfort from a paid employee who is supposed to be the body guard/handler. Bonding with someone because maybe their mother prefers PAID to BLOOD relatives. WHY, because maybe its easier to demand PAID sign confidentiality agreements and are more controllable. CRAZY Mommy Dearest.

Head in Sand said... [Reply]

Nothing is wrong with little girls clinging to men. Paid employees, not relatives. Other people's daddy, not their daddy.

These kids are STARVING for attention and affection from any adult that will give it to them. I fear for their future.

Anonymous said... [Reply]

jibberjabbers said...

All I asked was, "does this look right to you?"....

If you're offended by that simple question, then obviously you see something wrong with this picture.

--

Oh please. The intent of your question was clear and the disgusting response from one of your readers left nothing to the imagination.

Anonymous said... [Reply]

Nothing is wrong with little girls clinging to men. Paid employees, not relatives. Other people's daddy, not their daddy.

These kids are STARVING for attention and affection from any adult that will give it to them. I fear for their future.

--

He's not just "any adult." He's someone with whom the children have spent a lot of time. Small children don't distinguish between paid help and other people in their lives. I suppose Kate should have sat her 4 or 5 year old children down and said "Listen, kids, this man is MY PAID BODYGUARD. Don't talk to him. Don't let him be nice to you. He's just the hired help." Children bond with people that they are around frequently if those people are nice to them. Big flippin' deal. Good grief.

Are you equally upset when one of the boys gets a hug from the nanny? Women can be pedophiles too.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Steve is Kate's bodyguard. Look at how's he dressed. Bodyguard are to be "professional" and stand guard at all times.

Not carry Kate's purse and play with the kids.

How many bodyguards out there does what Steve does?

Head in Sand said... [Reply]

Chopper guys, camera men . . . anybody that they can bond with, they do.

Head in Sand said... [Reply]

The people who see nothing wrong with this picture are the same people that believe potty & shower scenes are just "cute" and would never be used in a disgusting way for the pleasure of a pedophile.

If you put your fingers in your ear and go "la la la la" I bet you can NOT SEE the BLATANT child abuse that these kids have endured.

Anonymous said... [Reply]

Strangely enough, I do not need to put my fingers in my ear or go "la la la la" to disagree with you. Blatant child abuse? Hardly.

You have to be truly twisted to see something sinister about that picture.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

^ Coming from a sheeple who see's NOTHING wrong with what Kate does. Someone who makes every excuse in the book to blindly support Kate.

You're last statement is a oxymoron. "you have to be twisted to see something sinister about it".

LOL. That's like saying you have to be a burglar to see that robbing a bank is wrong.

Anonymous said... [Reply]

You're last statement is a oxymoron. "you have to be twisted to see something sinister about it".

LOL. That's like saying you have to be a burglar to see that robbing a bank is wrong.

--

I don't think you know what aN oxymoron is. Perhaps you can look it up after you learn the difference between "mute" and "moot." After that, you might want to work on constructing an analogy, as your attempt here was rather pathetic.

If your mind sees something sexual in something perfectly innocent, that is your issue. When a small child is involved, something is very, very wrong with the people perceiving the picture in that way.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

If you see nothing wrong with it, then clearly you think it's "normal" and that maybe you are the sick one?

After all, pedophiles find "nothing" wrong with what they do.

Burglars and robbers find "nothing" wrong with what they do.

Well maybe the find it "wrong" yet do it anyways.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Again, coming from a sheeple I am not surprised.

After all, you found nothing wrong with Kate smacking her kids in the face to quiet him down.

You found nothing wrong with the way Kate treated Jon.

You found nothing wrong with the way Kate treated Tony.

You found nothing wrong with the way Kate pinched Alexi's shoulder on camera. With Alexis rubbing her shoulder in pain for a good 2 minutes while giving Kate a long stare..

You find nothing wrong with anything Kate does.
Kate is perfect in your eyes.

This is how delusional you sheeple are.

Does that picture look right to you?

Head in Sand said... [Reply]

Nothing wrong with begging for money while having an inheritance in the bank

Nothing wrong with lying in church

Nothing wrong with denying Mady water

Nothing wrong with putting a sick child on the cold laundry room floor

Nothing wrong with ignoring a child in pain while shopping -- beds were FREE!!

Nothing wrong with calling a little girl "mean and ugly"

Nothing wrong with alienating all family members. It's always THEM. Katie Irene can't be the problem.

Nothing wrong with crying on TV that "I have a purse full of bills I cannot pay" when, in actuality, she had 11 other bank accounts.

Nothing wrong with publicly implying that the father of your children is not helping to raise them or care for their financial needs.

Nothing wrong with being away from your small, growing children for weeks and weeks at a time, even after saying, ON FILM, "I will never leave my babies again." Oh, yeah, they aren't babies anymore.

Nothing wrong with keeping 6 kids back in school to accommodate the filming schedule.

I could go on and on but my fingers are getting numb.

Sheeple have an excuse for each and every incident.

Head in Sand said... [Reply]

The Sheeple site resents being called Sheeple.
She doesn't like it so I guess since they defend everything Kate does, they are not sheeple.

They are SUPERSHEEPLE!!

Anonymous said... [Reply]

If you see nothing wrong with it, then clearly you think it's "normal" and that maybe you are the sick one?

After all, pedophiles find "nothing" wrong with what they do.

Burglars and robbers find "nothing" wrong with what they do.

Well maybe the find it "wrong" yet do it anyways.

---

You're the one who sees something sexual in an innocent picture. I did not say there is nothing wrong with being a pedophile. I said, VERY CLEARLY, that there is nothing sexual about this picture. If you find a picture of a child hugging an adult sexual in nature, YOU have a problem. Get the help that you so clearly need so you can stop obsessing over Kate's "crotch" and stop viewing an innocent child in a sexual light.

BTW, implying that Steve Neild is a pedophile, which you have just done, is an accusation with legal ramifications. I hope this blog is being monitored and he sues the crap out of you.

Head in Sand said... [Reply]

There are websites implying that Kate is a mother so can we sue those sites for lying too?

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Not accusing anyone of anything. All I said was, "does this picture look right to you?".

It's a simple and honest question.

The only person who said anything close to that was YOU and some other sheeple plus "Anonymous" at 10:39pm... Which is probably a sheeple "plant" to try and cause problems here.

Everyone just said it was wrong. I'll delete that anonymous post.

HI 50 said... [Reply]

Anonymous, May 4, 2010 5:51 PM. You are the only one "implying Steve Nield is a pedophile." No one else.

Here's the problem. The children are starving for attention, so they are at great risk for harm from anyone. If they were out in public, not closely monitored, a "friendly stranger" with a camera could easily lure them away because the children have been taught that the camera men are their friends. BIG problem!

Anonymous said... [Reply]

Not accusing anyone of anything. All I said was, "does this picture look right to you?".

It's a simple and honest question.

No, that's not all you said. You followed up my comment about the picture in question with the following:

"If you see nothing wrong with it, then clearly you think it's "normal" and that maybe you are the sick one?"

That statement implies that the picture shows abnormal behavior and anyone who doesn't see it may be "sick." Those are your words. And anyone who thinks your initial question was just a simple and honest question is the biggest "sheeple" of them all. There was nothing simple nor honest about it. It was full of innuendo. You know it. I know it. Any sane person reading it knows it.

TheresaB said... [Reply]

la la la la child molesters don't exist la la la la la I can't hear you la la la lala

itsaboutthekids said... [Reply]

What I see in this picture is a little girl who is snuggling up to a man who is not her father or a relative. She probably sees him as a friend, but we know that friend is reportedly a body guard for her mother due to threats she's received (BIG ? there). I know if I was young and the day came that I realized my mother needed a body guard to protect her, I would live in fear of something happening to her, or me. And yet, Kate continues to put herself out there, or at least pretend she needs protection, without regard to what this does to the children. I wonder what Cara and Mady think of him?

Also, I wonder how Cara felt having Steveo running behind her in the race, knowing everyone along the way probably knew who he was and why he was there. The little kids probably are still unaware that it's not natural to be oogled and their every move watched by anyone and everyone. On the other hand, the girls are getting old enough to be resentful and embarrassed by all the attention. If they have to be on the new show I really do hope they get some enjoyment from it, but I have big doubts about that.

Anonymous said... [Reply]

TheresaB said...

la la la la child molesters don't exist la la la la la I can't hear you la la la lala

---

Nothing of the sort was said or implied. It is obvious from the tone of your response that you have the emotional maturity of a 6 year-old. Perhaps your reading comprehension skills are about at that level as well.

TheresaB said... [Reply]

You FANS are the immature ones because you cannot see the danger that the G8 are in. I was imitating SHEEPLE with my response.

jibberjabbers said... [Reply]

Don't worry about it. That's a "sheeple" for you.

They don't understand much. Besides their "delusion" of Kate and how she is perfect in every way.

Go to any of those pro-Kate blogs. You'll see the just how crazy they really are. No one is perfect. Yet, they believe Kate is and that she does no wrong and has never made any mistake.

She is like a "God" to them.

Post a Comment

Please refrain from personal attacks aimed at other posters/commenters. We all have our own opinions and you are free to express them here, but keep it civilized as it creates are more friendly environment.

Not all comments will be approved.